Author Topic: The elusive Michael Lee  (Read 7959 times)

Offline pomp

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 191
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: The elusive Michael Lee
« Reply #36 on: Thursday 01 March 18 08:47 GMT (UK) »
I’m not even sure I understand the logical thread of it now. As a newbie I’m a bit lost :-)

Offline pomp

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 191
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: The elusive Michael Lee
« Reply #37 on: Thursday 01 March 18 08:59 GMT (UK) »

So .... I now have a snow day, so I'm going to start with the latest census and work back with the Lees Leahy Lea etc.

So far I'm optimistic  ::)

Offline heywood

  • RootsChat Honorary
  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 40,869
    • View Profile
Re: The elusive Michael Lee
« Reply #38 on: Thursday 01 March 18 09:09 GMT (UK) »
Have you read the posts #30 and #31?

 :) and there am I thinking I have set it out logically!
This is what I think - warning -just my thoughts though

Reply #30
1861
Timothy and Mary Leahy with child Michael

1871
Possibly your Mary Anne with her mother Margaret (Gibbon) but no Michael

1871
Timothy and Mary Leahy


Reply 31

Links this Leahy family through Mary - maiden name Forrest and some parish records in Cork.

There is also a possible death for Timothy Leahy in 1883.

I posted the links on those posts so have not repeated them.


Census Information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline heywood

  • RootsChat Honorary
  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 40,869
    • View Profile
Re: The elusive Michael Lee
« Reply #39 on: Thursday 01 March 18 09:11 GMT (UK) »

So .... I now have a snow day, so I'm going to start with the latest census and work back with the Lees Leahy Lea etc.

So far I'm optimistic  ::)

You should be optimistic - it took a lot of searching. :)

Census Information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk


Offline pomp

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 191
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: The elusive Michael Lee
« Reply #40 on: Thursday 01 March 18 12:36 GMT (UK) »
The other thread is on the Irish board tracing Timothy in Cork but for Timothy married to Margaret.

I think it quite likely that the other Timothy married to Mary is more likely and he also seemed to be from Cork.

I think it runs like this:

Timothy Lee (b. 1827-32, Co Cork) wife Margaret O'Connor / Connors (b. 1819 Co Cork)

Children
Mary (b. 1851, Merthyr) - married James Coleman
Michael (b. 1849-52, ??)

Michael Lee (also Lea, Lay / though not convinced with Leahy, Lehay and Leiay) married
Margaret Gibbon

Children

Mary Ann (b. 1868-70, Blaina)
Rachel (b. 1874, Tredegar)
Williams (b. 1876, Tredegar)
Also possibly (because of 1881 census for Michael):
William (b. 1872 , Tredegar)
John (b. 1878, Blaina)
Margaret (b. 1881 - Blaina)

There is lots of corroborating evidence to support a variety of options. The Leahy dates don't seem to fit that well, apart from the 1871 census (which shows Margaret Leahy with Mary Ann Leahy in Tredegar), but I will look closer.

What do you think?

Offline heywood

  • RootsChat Honorary
  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 40,869
    • View Profile
Re: The elusive Michael Lee
« Reply #41 on: Thursday 01 March 18 13:13 GMT (UK) »
Well I have Timothy Leahy and Mary Forrest. :-\
Census Information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline pomp

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 191
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: The elusive Michael Lee
« Reply #42 on: Thursday 01 March 18 13:14 GMT (UK) »
Have you read the posts #30 and #31?

 :) and there am I thinking I have set it out logically!
This is what I think - warning -just my thoughts though

Reply #30
1861
Timothy and Mary Leahy with child Michael

1871
Possibly your Mary Anne with her mother Margaret (Gibbon) but no Michael

1871
Timothy and Mary Leahy


Reply 31

Links this Leahy family through Mary - maiden name Forrest and some parish records in Cork.

There is also a possible death for Timothy Leahy in 1883.

I posted the links on those posts so have not repeated them.

I've spotted a flaw in my thoughts so am now going to explore yours  ???

Regards

David

Offline heywood

  • RootsChat Honorary
  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 40,869
    • View Profile
Re: The elusive Michael Lee
« Reply #43 on: Thursday 01 March 18 13:17 GMT (UK) »
I was just going to ask where do you have Mary Lee b 1851 who married Coleman.
Have you got a census reference?

The Leahy dates don’t fit well with what?

However, you have now posted re your flaw  ;)
Census Information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline pomp

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 191
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: The elusive Michael Lee
« Reply #44 on: Thursday 01 March 18 13:40 GMT (UK) »
I was just going to ask where do you have Mary Lee b 1851 who married Coleman.
Have you got a census reference?

The Leahy dates don’t fit well with what?

However, you have now posted re your flaw  ;)

This is my flaw:

1891 census James Coleman with Mary Coleman in Merthyr
and also father in law Timothy Lea age 50 (age scribbled out then 50 re-inserted)

I tied Mary in as possible sister of Michael (son of Timothy), but unfortunately, Mary's mother's maiden name is O'Connor / Connors (married Dec Q 1866 Merthr)

So that strand of evidence falls away

D