is it a different Jane?
I thought I should mention this one, the dob is totally wrong, but she was born in the city centre and was an inn keeper.
Forename Surname Age Year Born Relation Birth Place Occupation
Jane Adamson 60 1821 Head St Oswolds, Durham Inn Keeper
I think we can rule her out, but noteworthy.
You asked, "Who were the witnesses on the marriage certificate in March 1889?" Robert Dunn and Sarah Breivis / Brewis, at Queen Street Methodist Chapel, S Shields.
Martin
Hi Martin,
Well I do now think it is a different Jane and I've spent much of the day trying to learn more and more about her.
We can start here with this find:
Marriages Mar 1845
Adamson Robert Newtle Tyne 25 313
SMITH Jane Newcastle T. 25 313
Why they would have married in Newcastle is a bit of a mystery since both were born and living in Durham City. I've found all the relevant census entries.
It could be that Jane went to Jarrow/South Shields to work and established some connections there. I still haven't pursued the Dunn and Brewis names, but they could be relevant in this search.
Jane's father Thomas Smith was a Carpet Weaver born in Sedgefield Durham but living in Durham City from an early date since dtr Jane was born there -
Baptisms, Durham District
Record Number: 617912.0
Location: Durham City
Church: St. Margaret
Denomination: Anglican
29 Sep 1822 Jane Smith, of Framwellgate, daughter of Thomas (weaver) & Elizabeth Smith
as was -
Baptisms, Durham District
Record Number: 618256.0
Location: Durham City
Church: St. Margaret
Denomination: Anglican
15 Apr 1827 Robert Henry Jefferson Adamson, of Crossgate, son of James (mason) & Margaret Adamson, private baptism 9 Apr 1825
There is only one thing that is a bit out of synch. with this family and that is the age of their daughter Jane Adamson 5 years old in the 1861 census. Robert Adamson was both a Mason and an Innkeeper so that latter occupation ran in the family for a long time.
This could be her birth:
Births Sep 1856
Adamson Jane Durham 10a 228
We can find Jane with sons Robert James and William still in Durham City in 1881 which is the same census you refer to above and the gateway to this line of search. But no sign of Jane at this time. She will be there somewhere, probably a mis-transcription of her name.
As for George and his two ladies, well it does look very much like he was seeing both at much the same time. Mary in Scarborough always described herself as married even years later, and Jane up in Hartlepool did go back to the Thompson surname in 1901 but reverted to Leggett in 1911. That is a small indication, but worth keeping in mind.
Hope this helps a bit, Malcolm