Hello There,
The above people were my 7x great grandparents.
They had a Clandestine marriage at The Fleet Prison. On the original image on Find My Past, it states that John was a Weaver of Stepney, and was a Batchelor. It also states that Mary was a minor.
There are a few family trees on "Ancestry" that give John's father as Robert Fleetwood and Jane Perry, married in 1713. They have John being baptised in 1720, at St. Andrew Undershaft, London. This Robert was baptised on the 7th of March 1685, in London. That Robert was the son of another Robert who was baptised in 1659 in Chalfont St. Giles. His father George was a Regicide in the Civil war, and was knighted in 1656 by Oliver Cromwell.
Anyway, regarding the origins of John Fleetwood who was married in 1742, I have come across a few queries:
The John Fleetwood baptised at St. Andrew Undershaft, in 1720 may well have been a son of Robert Fleetwood who was a Glass Seller. And on both Find My Past, and on Ancestry, there is the original image and transcriptions of John Fleetwood in 1735 becoming an apprentice glass seller:
"Apprentice year 1735
Livery company Glass-seller
Details Fleetwood John, son of Robert, citizen and glass seller (deceased), to John Fleetwood, 19 Jun 1735, Glass-sellers' Company
Father's occupation citizen and glass seller":
"London Apprenticeship Abstracts, 1442-1850 Transcription": Find My Past.co.uk: © Cliff Webb.
This John's father, Robert was buried in 1721 at St. Andrew Undershaft.
If this is the same John Fleetwood who married Mary Mucklow in 1742, it just seems strange to me that his occupation would have been put down as a Weaver. Unless of course he decided to not finish his apprenticeship/ came upon hard times and then became a Weaver?
There is another baptism of a John Fleetwood on Find My Past, who was a son of another John Fleetwood who was a Weaver of Cinammon Street, Wapping. This is right near to Stepney.
But the only problem I have found with that is this John's full name was put down as: John Eaton Fleetwood. Also, he was baptised in 1729, and I think the transcription on Find My Past, gives his age as being 16 days at the time of his baptism.
If this was the same John Fleetwood who married in 1742, you may think that on the original image, they would both be put down on the register as minors would they not?
John and Mary's first child John Fleetwood, seems to have not been baptised until three years after their marriage. He was baptised in Whitechapel on Christmas day, 1745.
So this may give some weight to the fact that Mary Mucklow was indeed a minor when she married in 1742.
The only Mary Mucklow that I can find was a daughter of a William Mucklow, and Alice baptised in Holborn. The first one was baptised in 1730. And then according to the transcription on Find My Past, there was another one baptised with the same parents names in 1732 in Holborn.
This would mean that Mary Mucklow would have been 10/ 11 years old at the most when she married John Fleetwood in 1742.
Does anyone please know if 10 or 11 was around the age that some girls may have had a Clandestine marriage at? I can't seem to find any statistics regarding ages for these times.
Any information regarding this would be gratefully accepted.
Thank you very much.