Author Topic: Not a ladylike occupation!  (Read 2848 times)

Offline philipsearching

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 4,092
  • I was a beautiful baby - what went wrong?
    • View Profile
Re: Not a ladylike occupation!
« Reply #9 on: Saturday 06 October 18 17:04 BST (UK) »
In 1911 Richard Henry Auty Occupation: "Prostitute Machinist Missionary"  ???
There are a number of other peculiar transcriptions.
Stan

Given his actual occupation I shouldn't think he would be too pleased about that transcription  ;D

Hmmm - Primitive Methodist Minister - that would certainly worry his congregation!
Please help me to help you by citing sources for information.

Census information is Crown Copyright http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline SwissGill

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 471
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Not a ladylike occupation!
« Reply #10 on: Monday 08 October 18 11:21 BST (UK) »
James Tregaskis, Member of Free Mason Grand Lodge in Stanmore Middlesex - Profession: Prostitute
Whitlow: Witton-cum-Twambrooks/Northwich
Bowers: Marthall, Siddington, Cheshire
Owen: Cheshire
Pfisterer (Fisher): West Riding Yks 1850-1875
Fisher (Pfisterer): Des Moines, Iowa 1886-
Wallis: West Riding Yks/Des Moines, Iowa, 1892-
Heinzmann: Hull/Northwich
Pfisterer, Heinzmann, Künzelsau, Baden-Württemberg
Brueck: Kocherstetten B-W
Volpp: Morsbach B-W
Schluchterer: Künzelsau, B-W

Offline Milliepede

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 15,281
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Not a ladylike occupation!
« Reply #11 on: Monday 08 October 18 20:37 BST (UK) »
Multitasking was alive and well  :o
Hinchliffe - Huddersfield Wiltshire
Burroughs - Arlingham Glos
Pick - Frocester Glos

Offline Maiden Stone

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 7,226
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Not a ladylike occupation!
« Reply #12 on: Monday 08 October 18 22:21 BST (UK) »
Now I understand why census returns are closed for 100 years.
Cowban


Offline Maiden Stone

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 7,226
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Not a ladylike occupation!
« Reply #13 on: Monday 08 October 18 22:25 BST (UK) »
James Tregaskis, Member of Free Mason Grand Lodge in Stanmore Middlesex - Profession: Prostitute

Was he known for soliciting by any chance?

By no stretch of the imagination can a mason's apron be considered alluring attire.

Cowban

Offline despair

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,459
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Not a ladylike occupation!
« Reply #14 on: Monday 08 October 18 23:10 BST (UK) »
Not directly related,but I had to smirk when I chanced upon the reasonably common occupation - “trouser hand”.

Regards
Roger

Offline Maiden Stone

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 7,226
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Not a ladylike occupation!
« Reply #15 on: Monday 08 October 18 23:42 BST (UK) »
 ;D
Cowban

Offline andrewalston

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,938
  • My granddad
    • View Profile
Re: Not a ladylike occupation!
« Reply #16 on: Tuesday 09 October 18 12:58 BST (UK) »
Prostitution was only made illegal in England & Wales after the 1861 census.

FindMyPast lets you search for occupations. The 1871, which has few occupations transcribed, shows only a couple in England, one of whom was in gaol. The rest were in Scotland.
1891 shows 164 results, few of them in institutions.
Looking at ALSTON in south Ribble area, ALSTEAD and DONBAVAND/DUNBABIN etc. everywhere, HOWCROFT and MARSH in Bolton and Westhoughton, PICKERING in the Whitehaven area.

Census information is Crown Copyright. See www.nationalarchives.gov.uk for details.

Offline stanmapstone

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 25,798
    • View Profile
Re: Not a ladylike occupation!
« Reply #17 on: Tuesday 09 October 18 14:44 BST (UK) »
In Limehouse, in 1871, one enumerator described every prostitute as 'fallen' in the occupation column. The term 'prostitute' does not appear in the occupational dictionaries used to abstract data in the Census Office.

Stan
Census Information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk