I do not believe there is any marriage for William HAYWOOD/HAYWARD and Eliza ROWLEY
So, yes, I think both girls were illegitimate, and Mary Ann's birth reg doesn't even try to hide it. Who knows who her father really is.
Do you think William would have lied about his birth?
Well, the ONLY information we have that can be relied upon to any extent is the 1841. He's 20 so anywhere between 24 & 20, so born between 1817 & 1821. He is recorded as being born out of county, and there is no S or I (for Scotland or Ireland) in that column, just the tick, the same as Eliza. So I THINK on the basis of that he must have been born in England.
Sarah Jane must have had some reason to record Gaelic in that census. It's one thing to put Scots, because that's what you think, but Gaelic? You wouldn't think you would make that up.
You might have to have a DNA test
hawker is a gypsy - a traveling salesman
Yes, I agree. Not necessarily a Gypsy but certainly similar. Hawkers had to have a hawker's licence and I have man who was a travelling optician who sometimes listed himself as hawker.
I just think it very strange when we have Eliza as ROWLEY in 1842, & at 1845 marrige to SIDEBOTHAM
Sarah Jane is ROWLEY in 1851 and also in 1866 at her marriage to John JORDAN. Births of her children have mother's maiden name as ROWLEY - she is completely going by ROWLEY. and yet in the USA HAYWARD comes back in.
So why suddenly does Mary Ann become Mary Rowley HAYWARD in 1863 at her marriage.
but then in 1866 at birth of son Edmund DEW her maiden name is again ROWLEY not HAYWARD