Author Topic: Conditional Baptism  (Read 2051 times)

Offline stanmapstone

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 25,798
    • View Profile
Re: Conditional Baptism
« Reply #9 on: Wednesday 23 January 19 08:46 GMT (UK) »
If the midwife or family member had used water and the correct wording, then there isn't a baptism. The child is received into the congregation and the godparents make their promises on its behalf.

Do you mean that there is not a second Church Baptism, not that there was no valid baptism by the midwife or family member?

There are numerous posts on RootsChat about baptisms and private baptisms.

Stan
Census Information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline Geordie Mag

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 329
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Conditional Baptism
« Reply #10 on: Wednesday 23 January 19 14:59 GMT (UK) »
it should read "if the midwife or family member had used water and the correct words, then there would not be a baptism  in the church." The child would instead  be received into the Church in a ceremony which basically used the second half of the baptism service.
Northumberland: Little, Hogg, Tyers, Reid
Durham: Todd, Lee,
Cumbria: Ross, Ivison, Tyers
Yorkshire North Riding: Pybus, Alderson, Rutherford, Mudd, Wilson
Sussex: Selmes, Ashdown, Freelove, Mitchell