Author Topic: Watlington 1640 - COMPLETED  (Read 1158 times)

Offline grantleydawn

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,792
  • My collateral ancestors
    • View Profile
Watlington 1640 - COMPLETED
« on: Tuesday 19 February 19 02:25 GMT (UK) »
Can anyone please help me with the word Corarij or Corary that appears in the following baptism.

As per the Parish Registers of Watlington, Oxfordshire ;
“. . . . vicesimo primo die
ffebruarij 1640
Susanna filia Simo’is Bartlett
Corarij Bap: eodem die eodem per anno 1640”

As per The Record Interpreter (1892), Corar is an abbreviation of corporaltier [latin for Carnally or Corporally], which I guess is saying that Susanna was the illegitimate daughter of Simon.

I am researching Susanna [the logical daughter of Simon BARTLETT], who married Richard BUTLER on the 27th Jun 1658 at Britwell Salome.

Regards
Grantley

Offline tonepad

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,351
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Watlington 1640
« Reply #1 on: Tuesday 19 February 19 06:22 GMT (UK) »
The word could be the occupation 'corarii'  or currier (processing tanned hides) a variation of corarius.

https://worldofdictionary.com/dict/latin-english/meaning/corarius



Tony
Aucock/Aukett~Kent/Sussex, Broadway~Oxfordshire, Danks~Warwickshire, Fenn~Kent/Norfolk, Goatham~Kent, Hunt~Kent, Parker~Middlesex, Perry~Kent, Sellers~Kent/Yorkshire, Sladden~Kent, Wright~Kent/Essex

Offline grantleydawn

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,792
  • My collateral ancestors
    • View Profile
Re: Watlington 1640
« Reply #2 on: Tuesday 19 February 19 08:30 GMT (UK) »
Thank you Tony. I must admit that I did not concentrate on occupations. The Register is from 1635 to 1653 and it would seem that no other entry has an occupation. That led me to look for another meaning of this word.


End result is, that I have no idea on the reality.

At least I now have a choice. Thank you.

Offline Bookbox

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 7,918
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Watlington 1640
« Reply #3 on: Tuesday 19 February 19 08:51 GMT (UK) »
I agree with Tony. The word is in the masculine singular genitive and qualifies the father, not the daughter, so currier.

The wording at the end is eodem die eodemq(ue) anno = on the same day and in the same year.


Offline grantleydawn

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,792
  • My collateral ancestors
    • View Profile
Re: Watlington 1640
« Reply #4 on: Tuesday 19 February 19 09:03 GMT (UK) »
I am good with that.

Thank you to both of you.

And thank you for the correction of eodemq(ue).

Regards
Grantley

Offline grantleydawn

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,792
  • My collateral ancestors
    • View Profile
Re: Watlington 1640 - COMPLETED
« Reply #5 on: Tuesday 19 February 19 21:40 GMT (UK) »
In support of the word being the occupation of currier, I have found that in his son was recorded as a fellmonger. :)

Offline Bookbox

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 7,918
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Watlington 1640 - COMPLETED
« Reply #6 on: Tuesday 19 February 19 22:02 GMT (UK) »
Good find  :)