Author Topic: Matthew Henry Marshall marriage Essex 1888  (Read 1523 times)

Offline JJen

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 7,360
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Matthew Henry Marshall marriage Essex 1888
« Reply #9 on: Sunday 31 March 19 19:35 BST (UK) »
This could be the Marshalls on the 1891 -

Henry Marshall   32
Mary A Marshall   29
Maud Marshall   7
Mabel Marshall   3
Henry Marshall   2
Jessie Warner   17

RG12 Piece 1321 Folio 7 Page 8, West Ham, Essex

Maud Lawrence Marshall was born q1 1888, West Ham Vol 4a Page 210. Mother's maiden name Hoyes.

John Thomas J Marshall born q3 1891 West Ham Vol 4a Page 118. Mother's maiden name Hoyes. Unfortunately he died in 1892.

JJ

Offline jonw65

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 10,779
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Matthew Henry Marshall marriage Essex 1888
« Reply #10 on: Sunday 31 March 19 19:38 BST (UK) »
MARSHALL, MATTHEW  HENRY     
Mother HOGES 
GRO Reference: 1889  J Quarter in WEST HAM  Volume 04A  Page 93

You missed this one that I posted in Reply #8
having linked to 1891 in Reply #7

Offline JJen

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 7,360
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Matthew Henry Marshall marriage Essex 1888
« Reply #11 on: Sunday 31 March 19 19:39 BST (UK) »
Another birth -

Charles Lawrence Marshall
q3 1893, West Ham
Vol 4a Page 141
Mother's maiden name - Hoyes

JJ

Offline JJen

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 7,360
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Matthew Henry Marshall marriage Essex 1888
« Reply #12 on: Sunday 31 March 19 19:54 BST (UK) »
Wonder if this is Matthew Snr as the name Lawrence features in the children's birth records already posted -

Matthew Henry Lawrence Marshall
Birth - 7 Oct 1858, Manchester, Lancashire
First Service Date - 28 Feb 1874
First Ship Served On - Caledonia
Last Service Date - 22 Sep 1880
Last Ship Served On - V. Emanuel
Service Number - 85651

JJ


Offline JJen

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 7,360
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Matthew Henry Marshall marriage Essex 1888
« Reply #13 on: Sunday 31 March 19 20:00 BST (UK) »
Birth record -

Matthew Henry Lawrence Marshall   
q4 1858, Chorlton, Lancs
Vol 8c Page 478
Mother's maiden name - Jordan

JJ

Offline Westee

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 803
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Matthew Henry Marshall marriage Essex 1888
« Reply #14 on: Sunday 31 March 19 20:01 BST (UK) »
Really helpful. 
Thanks so much.

Offline nannyj

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,102
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Matthew Henry Marshall marriage Essex 1888
« Reply #15 on: Monday 01 April 19 23:55 BST (UK) »
Wonder if this is Matthew Snr as the name Lawrence features in the children's birth records already posted -

Matthew Henry Lawrence Marshall
Birth - 7 Oct 1858, Manchester, Lancashire
First Service Date - 28 Feb 1874
First Ship Served On - Caledonia
Last Service Date - 22 Sep 1880
Last Ship Served On - V. Emanuel
Service Number - 85651

JJ

If it is, his behaviour was exemplary until March 1880 when it was indifferent and he was imprisoned for 42 days. He was discharged as he was objectionable later same year. He was dark haired, grey eyed and only 5 foot and half an inch! Says his occupation was a clerk.
Jamiesons, Martins and McGonigals of Coleraine, Londonderry
and
Cullens, Grahams and Challenors of Dublin county and city.

Offline Westee

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 803
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Matthew Henry Marshall marriage Essex 1888
« Reply #16 on: Tuesday 02 April 19 00:39 BST (UK) »
Yes, more than likely. Really super. Tks.
The army records give much detail which is sometimes rather interesting and so good to have.