« Reply #11 on: Wednesday 08 May 19 17:31 BST (UK) »
Hi Boo,
Well, I see that there was an error made with the acronym yesterday - whether this was an mistake made by the newspaper or my mistake I am not sure at this point. Apologies if it was my error.
I didn't have a clue yesterday what this acronym meant either. I imagine though, it would have been understood by most readers back then.
I am glad to see that this query has been answered so well by helpful RootsChatters.
That is interesting that your direct ancestor was a poet. I imagine it would have been uncommon for women to write and have work published back then. If she was my ancestor I would feel quite proud of her achievement. I am thinking of the Bronte sisters and how at first they had to use mannish sounding pseudonyms to get a foot in the door. Wasn't it Robert Southey, the poet laureate, who tried to put Charlotte Bronte off writing when she wrote to him for advice? Imagine if she had listened to his stern response that she should give up the idea of writing on account of her being a woman. Just think what a loss to English literature if she had taken on board his advice!!
Conroy, Fitzpatrick, Watson, Miller, Davis/Davies, Brown, Senior, Dodds, Grieveson, Gamesby, Simpson, Rose, Gilboy, Malloy, Dalton, Young, Saint, Anderson, Allen, McKetterick, McCabe, Drummond, Parkinson, Armstrong, McCarroll, Innes, Marshall, Atkinson, Glendinning, Fenwick, Bonner