Pages: 1 [2] 3

Author Topic: Can anyone improve this photo please? (Very faded and indistinct).Lucy Kean  (Read 1538 times)

Offline Romilly

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 5,431
    • View Profile
Re: Can anyone improve this photo please? (Very faded and indistinct).Lucy Kean
« Reply #9 on: Saturday 24 August 19 15:14 BST (UK) »

This might be better still?
Any census information included in this post is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
Researching:
Wilson, Warren, Dulston, Hooper, Duffin, Petty, Rees, Davies, Williams, Newman, Dyer, Hamilton, Edmeads, Pattenden.

Offline Gadget

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 57,138
    • View Profile
Re: Can anyone improve this photo please? (Very faded and indistinct).Lucy Kean
« Reply #10 on: Saturday 24 August 19 15:18 BST (UK) »
Have PMed you, Romilly. It's still only 50 kb.
Census &  BMD information Crown Copyright www.nationalarchives.gov.uk and GROS - www.scotlandspeople.gov.uk

***Restorers - Please do not use my restores without my permission. Thanks***

Offline Romilly

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 5,431
    • View Profile
Re: Can anyone improve this photo please? (Very faded and indistinct).Lucy Kean
« Reply #11 on: Saturday 24 August 19 15:24 BST (UK) »
Any good?
Any census information included in this post is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
Researching:
Wilson, Warren, Dulston, Hooper, Duffin, Petty, Rees, Davies, Williams, Newman, Dyer, Hamilton, Edmeads, Pattenden.

Offline Gadget

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 57,138
    • View Profile
Re: Can anyone improve this photo please? (Very faded and indistinct).Lucy Kean
« Reply #12 on: Saturday 24 August 19 16:00 BST (UK) »
This is the one that I've reduced, Romilly. It will be better for the restorers  to work on

NB - resolution supplied is 96 dpi
Census &  BMD information Crown Copyright www.nationalarchives.gov.uk and GROS - www.scotlandspeople.gov.uk

***Restorers - Please do not use my restores without my permission. Thanks***

Offline Romilly

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 5,431
    • View Profile
Re: Can anyone improve this photo please? (Very faded and indistinct).Lucy Kean
« Reply #13 on: Saturday 24 August 19 16:52 BST (UK) »

Many Thanks Gadget.

The (ancient) edition of Photoshop that I have on my Desktop isn't very specific on kb sizes. (My OH won't let me touch the new version, because apparently I changed all the settings last time I used it:-)

Romilly.
Any census information included in this post is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
Researching:
Wilson, Warren, Dulston, Hooper, Duffin, Petty, Rees, Davies, Williams, Newman, Dyer, Hamilton, Edmeads, Pattenden.

Offline Mark_Diamond

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 30
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Can anyone improve this photo please? (Very faded and indistinct).Lucy Kean
« Reply #14 on: Saturday 24 August 19 21:05 BST (UK) »
Another Attempt
Brogan
Cassells
Diamond
Gillespie
Lennon
McConnell
McGowan
Prunty

Offline Romilly

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 5,431
    • View Profile
Re: Can anyone improve this photo please? (Very faded and indistinct).Lucy Kean
« Reply #15 on: Saturday 24 August 19 21:16 BST (UK) »

Many thanks Mark _Diamond.

Romilly.
Any census information included in this post is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
Researching:
Wilson, Warren, Dulston, Hooper, Duffin, Petty, Rees, Davies, Williams, Newman, Dyer, Hamilton, Edmeads, Pattenden.

Offline Trishanne

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 5,247
    • View Profile
Re: Can anyone improve this photo please? (Very faded and indistinct).Lucy Kean
« Reply #16 on: Sunday 25 August 19 02:21 BST (UK) »
One from me,
Pat
Bownass - Lancashire & Westmorland
Hoggarth - Lancashire & Westmorland
Jackson- Lancaster
Waller - Dent, Yorkshire dales
Omerod - Lancashire
Redburn - Lancashire
Evans - Hereford

RESTORERS please do not use my restores without my permission THANK YOU

Offline McGroger

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,731
  • Convicts, Commoners and Outlaws
    • View Profile
Re: Can anyone improve this photo please? (Very faded and indistinct).Lucy Kean
« Reply #17 on: Sunday 25 August 19 07:01 BST (UK) »
Another one.
Peter
Convicts: COSIER (1791); LEADBEATER (1791); SINGLETON (& PARKINSON) (1792); STROUD (1793); BARNES (aka SYDNEY) (1800); DAVIS (1804); CLARK (1806); TYLER (1810); COWEN (1818); ADAMS[ON] (1821); SMITH (1827); WHYBURN (1827); HARBORNE (1828).
Commoners: DOUGAN (1844); FORD (1849); JOHNSTON (1850); BEATTIE (& LONG) (1856); BRICKLEY (1883).
Outlaws: MCGREGOR (1883) & ass. clans, Glasgow, Glenquaich, Glenalmond and Glengyle.
Pages: 1 [2] 3