I think the Tile Sheds Inn is the building I've marked on this map extract. My reasoning is that the original picture shows that this is a double-width building, possibly formed by combining two semi-detached properties.
This is indicated by / would account for the lop-sidedness of the windows and door; i.e. there would originally have been another door and window in the space where the two larger signs are placed.
The building that I've marked on the extract is twice as wide as the ones to its right (from the perspective of the road) and the building on its left could be the structure visible to the extreme left of the photo.
This is also consistent with the viewpoint of the photo, i.e. it could be taken from the middle of the road.
My only point of doubt is that the map makes it look like a terraced rather than detached building and the roof line in the original picture makes it appear to be standalone. But we don't have an exact understanding of dates, so maybe the situation was different between the time of the picture being taken and the time of the map being drawn.
ADDED: also, the address is 2 South Road, so either the L-shaped building next door could be no. 1, or the left-hand side of the building was originally 1 South Road and the address would more correctly be 1-2 South Road. Speculation.
ADDED MORE: in the 1891 census, next door at 1 South Road is a sawyer, and next door but one [on the map] is a saw mill. There are also inhabitants at 3 South Road. So maybe the numbering happened after the two buildings were combined and the whole building is correctly just no. 2. Or maybe the two buildings theory is simply off the mark.
(Never sure when to keep adding or post separately... will stop now.)