My grandmothers brother died about 10 years ago. All his children have grown up and moved away, and only visit the grave infrequently.
My mum was passing through the town a couple of weeks ago and popped in to put some flowers on the grave. There was a note on the stone saying the stone was deemed to be unsafe and if not repaired by such and such a date, it would be removed.
As I said, the stone is about 10 years old, is a municipal cemetery, owned and run by the council. The stone was even erected by council workers. I fail to see that if the work was carried out properly in the first place, why within such a (relative) short space of time the descendants should be made to cough up.
With older cemeteries, especially those from 18th / 19th century in industrial areas, subsidence is a problem as industry declines, especially those industries which required large quantities of water. It has been proven that since the London brewing industry has collapsed, the extraction of ground water had been reduced and hence the ground water table is contantly rising. This will also have an effect on older buildings and structures, and will also affect headstones from the earlier period.
As these are in effect cultural monuments, cannot lottery money be allocated instead of for nonsense like "Angel of the North" in Gateshead and "B for Bang" in Manchester?