Married after "Registrars Banns"

[Rena]

Just to add that in over twenty years doing family history I have never before come across the term "registrar's banns"

Stan

Me neither Stan.    Bryan and I married in a Registrar's beautifully decorated room, which we booked March 1994 for the earliest date, because being in HM Forces he was being posted abroad.  The earliest date was the following September of that year and in all that time nobody mentioned anything about banns.

[Andrew Tarr]

Thomas Rass? apparently decided ...

Definitely Ragg, by comparison with other words, and a commoner surname I think.

[JenB]

Notice of a Marriage with the Registrar became known as "Registrar's Banns".

I can't see anything in any of the lengthy attachments to your post which include the words 'Registrar's Banns' 

[BumbleB]

Just a thought - the marriage entry - was it taken from the parish register, or from the marriage certificate?

My reason for asking this question - if the image was taken from the parish register, then was this a "one off" or were there other entries stating "Registrar's Banns" at about the same time?  In other words - was this the usual manner of entry by this particular cleric?

[Corryn]

BumbleB,

The image (1880) is from the register.
There is one other entry (1875) where he entered Registrars Banns but on that occasion crossed it out and put Superintendent Registrars Certificate.
Other later entries have Superintendent Registrars Certificate.
I've also noted he never missed a chance of putting "born out of wedlock" where he can!

Corryn

[BumbleB]

Perhaps no comment related to the Minister 

[Rena]

BumbleB,

The image (1880) is from the register.
There is one other entry (1875) where he entered Registrars Banns but on that occasion crossed it out and put Superintendent Registrars Certificate.
Other later entries have Superintendent Registrars Certificate.
I've also noted he never missed a chance of putting "born out of wedlock" where he can!

Corryn

During my lifetime.  I believe if the parents married within three years of the baby being born, then the baby was legally the child of the mother's husband. (work that out lol)

[majm]

BumbleB,

The image (1880) is from the register.
There is one other entry (1875) where he entered Registrars Banns but on that occasion crossed it out and put Superintendent Registrars Certificate.
Other later entries have Superintendent Registrars Certificate.
I've also noted he never missed a chance of putting "born out of wedlock" where he can!

Corryn

During my lifetime.  I believe if the parents married within three years of the baby being born, then the baby was legally the child of the mother's husband. (work that out lol)

What jurisdiction?   My youngest siblings were born 15 years after my parents married.  I was born in 1947,  my parents were married back in the 1930s...  WWII separates my older siblings from the rest of us. 

JM

[Rena]

BumbleB,

The image (1880) is from the register.
There is one other entry (1875) where he entered Registrars Banns but on that occasion crossed it out and put Superintendent Registrars Certificate.
Other later entries have Superintendent Registrars Certificate.
I've also noted he never missed a chance of putting "born out of wedlock" where he can!

Corryn

During my lifetime.  I believe if the parents married within three years of the baby being born, then the baby was legally the child of the mother's husband. (work that out lol)

What jurisdiction?   My youngest siblings were born 15 years after my parents married.  I was born in 1947,  my parents were married back in the 1930s...  WWII separates my older siblings from the rest of us. 

JM

I probably made a mistake when I stated "my lifetime".  The occasion was early 1960s and my brother asked legal advice about his child who had been born out of wedlock when parents were under 21 years of age because parental consent for the parents to marry wasn't given.  He thought he would have to officially adopt his own child when they married, but the advice he was given was that IF they (the parents) had married after the child was 3 years old, he would have to officially adopt his own child.  At time of marriage (one day after father's 21st birthday) child wasn't two years old.