It amazes me that given the conditions and horrors of WWI ,and those of the war in Burma and Japanese’s prison camps etc ,the second world war in Europe ,then Korea ,Malaya and Cypress and Israel and Aden ,The Falklands, that there were not so many men with PTSD.
I know “ Shell shock “ was a blanket term ,but ordinary men like my father had no help, just had to get on with life, and a very deprived life given the economic conditions prevailing in the 1920’s and 1930’s .
Why is it then that so many present day ex soldiers suffer so badly from PTSD?
Surely what they see and experience is not different ,it is all hard and horrible .
Can it be that the openness that is encouraged is not necessarily better?
That is a genuine question and not a judgement.
Many men have changed, you never saw a man pushing a pram ,or shopping
for food. They had hardly any part in their babies’ lives ,change a nappy!!!
So is it their feminine side which gives them more sensitivity?
I am just curious , but it took some bottle to bottle up the experience of WWI
and all the following conflicts ,until relatively recently .
Perhaps someone knows if there were many more men affected psychologically than we generally are aware of.
Whatever, PTSD is a great tragedy .
Viktoria.