Author Topic: Where might I be able to locate a 17th century divorce case?  (Read 2291 times)

Offline goldie61

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 4,901
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Where might I be able to locate a 17th century divorce case?
« Reply #9 on: Tuesday 22 September 20 00:13 BST (UK) »
Had a few minutes to spare so made a start on transcribing it.

Whereas heretofore that is to say in or about the
Terme ^of^ the holy Trinity which was in the * of our lord
God according to the Computac(i)on of the Church of
England one thousand six hundred ninety and eight
William Hockmore  esquire exhibitted his bill of Complaint into
the high and honourable Court of Chancery against Mary
Hockmore wife of the said Complainant William Hockmore
Mary Hockmore Jane Hockmore Honora Hockmore Alice
Hockmore and Prestwood  Hockmore children of the Complainant
and the said Mary Hockmore his wife George Prestwood esquire
Gilbert yard esquire John Ridgley Dorcas(?) Pearson and others
therein named Defendants THEREBY setting forth That the
said Complainant sometime in the yeare one thousand six
hundred ninety and one did Intermarry with the said
Defendant Mary and In considerac(i)on of fifteen hundred pounds to
be payd the Compainant by the Defendant Prestwood her
father as a marriage porc(i)on with her the Complainant by
his Deeds of lease and Release bearing date the fifteenth
and eighteenth dayes of Aprill in the yeare of our lord one
thousand six hundred ninety one did settle and Convey
severall estates in the Countyes of Devon and Somersett  to the
Defendant Prestwood Thomas Prestwood Richard Norris and
John Cartchurch and their heires To the use of the said
Complainant for life after to the said Defendant Mary for
her Jointure the Remainder to the Issue male of their bodyes
lawfully begotten with a p(ro)vision therein for raiseing porc(i)ons
for such daughters as they should have the Remainder to
the right heires of the Complainant for ever And the
Complainant did further settforth that soone after the
execuc(i)on of the said Deeds the marriage was
solemenized and the Complainant and Defendant Mary
lived together four yeares very loveingly and contentedly vizt
untill the moneth of December one thousand six hundred
ninety and five when the said Defendant Mary haveing
gott acquaintance with a company eloped from the
Complainant and took with her three of the children
/
great quantities of plate Jewells diamond Rings
household goods ready money and other goods and ch(at)ells
to the value of att least five hundred pound and came
to London where she soone became acquainted with idle and
lewd persons and spent and consumed all the said effects
in lesse than three monethes time


* the scribe seems to have missed out the word 'year' here.

Question to those more knowledgeable:
Are the faint 's's at the ends of word such as 'goods', 'rings', etc still transcribed as 'es' at this point in time?
Lane, Burgess: Cheshire. Finney, Rogers, Gilman:Derbys
Cochran, Nicol, Paton, Bruce:Scotland. Bertolle:London
Bainbridge, Christman, Jeffs: Staffs

Offline Maiden Stone

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 7,226
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Where might I be able to locate a 17th century divorce case?
« Reply #10 on: Tuesday 22 September 20 01:51 BST (UK) »
The daughter, Prestwood, was apparently baptized in London (though William and Mary were from Devon, Mary apparently ran off to London during a dispute with her husband) in early 1696 under "Prestwood Buckmore, son [sic] of William and Mary Buckmore." Not sure why she was referred to as a son, Mr. Grylls doesn't say.

Have you read the original baptism register and is it in English or are you going off a translation or transcription? I wondered if there may be confusion between "f." or "fil.", abbreviations for filius (son) and filia (daughter). Although any confusion may have been in the mind of the baptising clergyman, thinking a baby named Prestwood was male.  :)
Cowban

Offline goldie61

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 4,901
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Where might I be able to locate a 17th century divorce case?
« Reply #11 on: Tuesday 22 September 20 04:47 BST (UK) »
Page 2 from AALT

..... three moneths time and by meanes of her
new acquaintance contracted debt to the value of foure
hundred pounds and that afterward by the mediac(i)on of
some friend the breach was made upp and the Complain(an)t
was well reconciled to her and undertooke to and did
pay all her debts and thereupon the said Defendant
Mary in Apprill one thousand six hundred ninety and six
returned into Devonshire to the said Complainant and on
her knees with teares asked the Complainant forgivenesse
and p(ro)mised the Complainant that if afterward any difference
should happen if the Complainant would allow her any house
and small estate neare his owne  and her said fathers she
would be  bound with her children to live there and never
runne the Complainant in debte for herselfe or children or
keep any  ill company and that by those p(re)misses the Compla(inant)
was p(er)suaded to enter into Articles dated on or about the
tenth day of Apprill one thousand six hundred ninety and
six and did thereby Covenant to and with the said
Defendant George Prestwood and Gilbert yard after a
recitall of the said matters that the said Complain(an)t
would from henceforth and att all times then after
kindly receive and take into his care and protecc(i)on
the said Defendant and mainteine her according to her
degree and quality and treat her civilly and that
twas thereby further Covenanted that in case of a
second sep(er)ac(i)on the Complainant was to allow her for
the maintenance of herselfe and children she then had
by the Complainant all her said Jointure estate soe
settled on her as aforesiad and that the said Defend(an)t
Prestwood and yard and the survivor of them should &
might imediately after such seperac(i)on take and receive
Lane, Burgess: Cheshire. Finney, Rogers, Gilman:Derbys
Cochran, Nicol, Paton, Bruce:Scotland. Bertolle:London
Bainbridge, Christman, Jeffs: Staffs

Offline Ruskie

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 26,279
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Where might I be able to locate a 17th century divorce case?
« Reply #12 on: Tuesday 22 September 20 05:18 BST (UK) »
 :o Mary.

Thanks for transcribing that Goldie - I was quite curious I must admit.  ;D

Nick, is this your family or do you have an interest in them for some other reason?


Offline goldie61

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 4,901
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Where might I be able to locate a 17th century divorce case?
« Reply #13 on: Tuesday 22 September 20 05:32 BST (UK) »
Couldn't resist some more of the plot!  :)


Images 3 & 4

....take and receive
all the rents and profitts of such Jointure estate dureing
the Complainants life for the said Defendant Maryes use
and for the maintenance of herselfe and children which
she then had by the Complainant and for noe other
use or purpose whatsoever and that itt was thereby
p(ro)vided that after such second seperac(i)on the Defendant
Mary should live with the said Defendant Prestwood her
father but if he would not consent thereto then she was
to live at her Jointure house the Compainant leavinge
there all the household goods thereunto belonging for the
Defendant Maryes use and under another p(ro)visoe that after
such seperate maintenance the Defendant Mary should
not run or incurr any debt on the Complainant soe as to
bring him into any trouble or molestatc(i)on whatsoever by
meanes thereof and the Complainant thereby Covenanted
that after his debts payd hee would raise twoe thousand
five hundred pounds as an Addic(i)on to the porc(i)on of the
daughters begotten or to be begotten on the body of the
said Defendant Mary which said twoe thousand five
hundred pounds together with the fifteen hundred pounds
thentofore settled to be payd att their respective ages of
one and twenty yeares or dayes of marriage which
should first happen Provided that they marryed with the
consent of their said father and mother and of the said
Defendants yard and Prestwood and if either marryed
without such consent then the  porc(i)on and share of such
person was to be to the use of the heires and Assignes of the
Complainant And for the better performance of the before
menc(i)oned Articles the Complainant Covenanted to make
further Assurance within three monethes then after As by
the said Articles a counterparte thereof to which the
Complainant referred himselfe might more fully Appeare AND
the Complainant did further settforth that notwithstanding he
had kindly reced* the said Defendant Mary and forgiven her
all things past and hoped for an amnedment and that she
would have either lived contentedly amd happily att
home with him or att her said Jointure estate yet without


* there is no contraction mark here, but I think this would read ‘received’
 
................................................... yet without
the least provoca(i)on given her by the Complainant or any
Cause whatsoever in lesse then two monethes time when his
present maiestyes fleet* layd att Torbay in the yeare one
thousand six hundred ninety and six haveing by such her
such first elopement gotten acquaintance with one Manly
and other Seamen belonging to the said fleet she invited
them and entertained them att the said Compl(ainant)s house
against his consent and that by contrivance of the said
Defendant Mary and her maide servant and other
confederates the Complainant was locked upp in a chamber
in his owne dwelling house and was there confined for
considerable time untill by the contrivance of one Mr
Stephens the Complainants neighbour and some of his
servants on Complainant made to them out att* window the
Complainant was helped and Released out att* window
and by such meanes escaped and was thereupon forced
to leave his dwelling house but the Defendant Mary his
wife with the offices and seamen continued still in the
house where she behaved herselfe very undecently and
wasted and consumed severall sheep hogsheads of
beare  and sider and other provisions of and belonging
to the house and kept the Complainant out of his house
and refused him entrance and lay and cohabited with
such souldiers in the Complainants house And that in
August one thousand six hundred six hundred* ninety
and six  the said Defendant Mary caused severall goods


* the scribe has actually written ‘freet’ here, but ‘fleet’ later on
* both these ‘att’ could be ‘all’; the scribe tends to cross double ‘l’s the same as double ‘t’s, netiher of which make a lot of sense here!
* the scribe has written ‘six hundred’ here twice
Lane, Burgess: Cheshire. Finney, Rogers, Gilman:Derbys
Cochran, Nicol, Paton, Bruce:Scotland. Bertolle:London
Bainbridge, Christman, Jeffs: Staffs

Offline Ruskie

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 26,279
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Where might I be able to locate a 17th century divorce case?
« Reply #14 on: Tuesday 22 September 20 05:43 BST (UK) »
Mary, Mary, Mary  ....  ::)

This is turning into a real page turner Goldie. You couldn’t make this up!  ;D

Offline horselydown86

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,805
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Where might I be able to locate a 17th century divorce case?
« Reply #15 on: Tuesday 22 September 20 06:07 BST (UK) »
Question to those more knowledgeable:
Are the faint 's's at the ends of word such as 'goods', 'rings', etc still transcribed as 'es' at this point in time?

I haven't seen it stated explicitly but I believe so.

Also:

Agree with Dorcas.

...out att window... looks right.  I'd say it's their conventional expression:  at window rather than the window.

One other I noticed - you have ill company right in Reply #11 but in Reply #9 (near bottom of first section) you have it as a company.

Offline goldie61

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 4,901
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Where might I be able to locate a 17th century divorce case?
« Reply #16 on: Tuesday 22 September 20 07:37 BST (UK) »
Mary, Mary, Mary  ....  ::)

This is turning into a real page turner Goldie. You couldn’t make this up!  ;D

 ;D ;D

Will see if I have some free time tonight  :)
Lane, Burgess: Cheshire. Finney, Rogers, Gilman:Derbys
Cochran, Nicol, Paton, Bruce:Scotland. Bertolle:London
Bainbridge, Christman, Jeffs: Staffs

Offline goldie61

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 4,901
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Where might I be able to locate a 17th century divorce case?
« Reply #17 on: Tuesday 22 September 20 07:40 BST (UK) »
Question to those more knowledgeable:
Are the faint 's's at the ends of word such as 'goods', 'rings', etc still transcribed as 'es' at this point in time?

I haven't seen it stated explicitly but I believe so.

Also:

Agree with Dorcas.

...out att window... looks right.  I'd say it's their conventional expression:  at window rather than the window.

One other I noticed - you have ill company right in Reply #11 but in Reply #9 (near bottom of first section) you have it as a company.

Thanks HD for clearing up those points.
Interesting expression 'out at window'.
Lane, Burgess: Cheshire. Finney, Rogers, Gilman:Derbys
Cochran, Nicol, Paton, Bruce:Scotland. Bertolle:London
Bainbridge, Christman, Jeffs: Staffs