« Reply #73 on: Wednesday 28 June 23 12:51 BST (UK) »
Also the more marriages I find in my tree, again, around 40% of the of the brides were pregnant when they wed, maybe a month to almost 9 months pregnant, going by the date of birth of the child. Just reiterates how huuuuuugely common bridal pregnancy was.
I found a new marriage in my tree in Suffolk in October 1809 and the bride was about 4 months pregnant at the time. Her first husband had died in March 1807.
Researching:
LONDON, Coombs, Roberts, Auber, Helsdon, Fradine, Morin, Goodacre
DORSET Coombs, Munday
NORFOLK Helsdon, Riches, Harbord, Budery
KENT Roberts, Goodacre
SUSSEX Walder, Boniface, Dinnage, Standen, Lee, Botten, Wickham, Jupp
SUFFOLK Titshall, Frost, Fairweather, Mayhew, Archer, Eade, Scarfe
DURHAM Stewart, Musgrave, Wilson, Forster
SCOTLAND Stewart in Selkirk
USA Musgrave, Saix
ESSEX Cornwell, Stock, Quilter, Lawrence, Whale, Clift
OXON Edgington, Smith, Inkpen, Snell, Batten, Brain