There are a few references to Hip- Hipp -or Hipper finishing in Holm or Holme in Halifax if you google the different spellings. (16th/17th century spelling of)
By searching for "Hipholm" and Halifax I found a few of these, but of the four I looked into, three were not an accurate representation of the original.
In two cases the original PR has the modified 'p' with a loop through the stem. This was reproduced in printed transcripts as a 'p' with a simple line through the stem, but in indexing these Google has failed to distinguish between that and an ordinary 'p' and shows it as 'Hipholm'.
In the third case the transcript has 'Hipholm', but the original register has Hip
rholm (with superscript 'r'); superscript letters usually indicate a degree of contraction, and there's clearly an 'r' there.
In the fourth case a printed transcript does have 'Hipholme', but I haven't been able to see the original. I can't prove it, but I strongly suspect this is a consequence of (a) a faded original which was transcribed 'as seen'; (b) a typesetter's mistake; or (c) a lack of a crossed 'p' in the typeface used. A single example from a secondary source doesn't prove much against the weight of other evidence.