Author Topic: Shared Matches v. Common Ancestors  (Read 1726 times)

Offline Gadget

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 57,142
    • View Profile
Re: Shared Matches v. Common Ancestors
« Reply #9 on: Saturday 04 September 21 11:19 BST (UK) »
Hi

In Painter, 47cMs suggests a range of possibles with more or less equal probabilities, including a high incidence of 'removes'. Do you know the age of your match so that a remove is possible?


Gadget
Census &  BMD information Crown Copyright www.nationalarchives.gov.uk and GROS - www.scotlandspeople.gov.uk

***Restorers - Please do not use my restores without my permission. Thanks***

Offline Gordon163

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 286
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Shared Matches v. Common Ancestors
« Reply #10 on: Saturday 04 September 21 12:14 BST (UK) »
Hi,

She was born about 1955, so 65ish.

How does the 'remove' idea work, please?

Gordon

Offline Gadget

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 57,142
    • View Profile
Re: Shared Matches v. Common Ancestors
« Reply #11 on: Saturday 04 September 21 12:42 BST (UK) »
If your parents are ,say, second cousins with a match, then you would be second cousin once removed .

e.g

a   b 1st cousins
|    |
c    d 2nd cousins
|   
e  2nd cousin once removed  to d
Census &  BMD information Crown Copyright www.nationalarchives.gov.uk and GROS - www.scotlandspeople.gov.uk

***Restorers - Please do not use my restores without my permission. Thanks***

Offline Gadget

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 57,142
    • View Profile
Re: Shared Matches v. Common Ancestors
« Reply #12 on: Saturday 04 September 21 12:46 BST (UK) »
Here's a snip from Painter showing the difference in range between 2nd cousin and 2nd cousin once removed

PS this applies to all levels of cousinship and removes.
Census &  BMD information Crown Copyright www.nationalarchives.gov.uk and GROS - www.scotlandspeople.gov.uk

***Restorers - Please do not use my restores without my permission. Thanks***


Offline Gadget

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 57,142
    • View Profile
Re: Shared Matches v. Common Ancestors
« Reply #13 on: Saturday 04 September 21 12:51 BST (UK) »
As a statistician, you might be interested in this:

https://isogg.org/wiki/Cousin_statistics
Census &  BMD information Crown Copyright www.nationalarchives.gov.uk and GROS - www.scotlandspeople.gov.uk

***Restorers - Please do not use my restores without my permission. Thanks***

Offline Gordon163

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 286
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Shared Matches v. Common Ancestors
« Reply #14 on: Saturday 04 September 21 14:19 BST (UK) »
Many thanks for this information - most interesting.

Gordon

Offline LizzieL

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 7,991
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Shared Matches v. Common Ancestors
« Reply #15 on: Sunday 12 September 21 09:53 BST (UK) »
A couple of days ago I had a new "Common Ancestor" match thrown up (person A).
Thrulines. She is not a new match as it is showing as previously viewed. She has not logged in for 3 - 11 months, so has not recently updated her tree.
I have not updated that branch of my tree for years and I misspelt the surname of the man who married my 4 x great grandfathers sister (who were her 4 x great grandparents).
I can only assume, someone else has added to their tree and in doing so provided our missing link.
I have checked her tree (9 people) and the interlinking trees and records they cited and cannot find any obvious faults, so I think she must really be my 6th cousin. Our shared matches are a first cousin once removed and a second cousin (daughter of the 1C1R) who are from the same line and should share the DNA of the same branch. So that all fits together nicely.
An unusual surname popping up in her line, led me to search trees for that name and location in all my DNA matches. One came up (Person P) who has a larger tree (908) and includes the name of my 4 x great grandfather's sister, so is also a 6th cousin of mine. He is a 3rd cousin of my first match. But he and I have no shared matches.
My match with A is at 13cM, with P it is 8cM. I know that shared matches have a cut off (20 possibly??), Shared Ancestor's don't, I have several with 6 and 7 cM matches. But I'm surprised that P has no shared match with my 1C1R and 2C.
This match has been significant because it is another bit of evidence to confirm my 4 x great grandfather and makes the couple who I think are my 5 x ggp more likely
Berks / Oxon: Eltham, Annetts, Wiltshire (surname not county), Hawkins, Pembroke, Partridge
Dorset / Hants: Derham, Stride, Purkiss, Sibley
Yorkshire: Pottage, Carr, Blackburn, Depledge
Sussex: Goodyer, Christopher, Trevatt
Lanark: Scott (soldier went to Jersey CI)
Jersey: Fowler, Huelin, Scott

Offline Flemming

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 913
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Shared Matches v. Common Ancestors
« Reply #16 on: Sunday 12 September 21 10:47 BST (UK) »
I know that shared matches have a cut off (20 possibly??), Shared Ancestor's don't

Is this bit true - that Ancestry will show matches lower than 8cM if you share a common ancestor with them?

Offline Gordon163

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 286
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Shared Matches v. Common Ancestors
« Reply #17 on: Sunday 12 September 21 10:54 BST (UK) »
I have a common ancestor with 6cm

Gordon