Pages: [1]

Author Topic: Ann Sharland  (Read 579 times)

Offline gilbertlouise

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 51
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Ann Sharland
« on: Monday 15 November 21 14:15 GMT (UK) »
Hi all,
I have an illegitimacy issue.
My 3rd Great Grandfather, James Bragg Quick/Quicke 7th March 1813, Stockleigh English, Devon. Is down on his baptism (if research is correct) as being illegitimate and his mother's name is Ann Quicke.
There is a document for marriage of Ann Sharland, bn, 3rd August 1774, to William Quick (Husbandman) of Shobrooke, in 1797 Shobrooke, Devon. Ann's father, it seems, is John Sharland, Blacksmith.
My DNA results tie me to the Sharland line, via Ann Sharland's sister's line, Elizabeth Sharland, through their mother Elizabeth Carrew bn 4 March 1746, Sandford, and their father, John Sharland bn 9th Oct 1744, Stockleigh English... and also the Quick line being 'Half' relations with the children of William Quick, James Bragg Quick's half brother.

My question is: How is James Bragg Quick illegitimate? Ann and William were married. All the children have the last name Quick. They must all be related through Ann?
Could it be possible that Ann had an affair during marriage maybe?
Could the DNA be wrong and Ann Sharland be a different person to Ann Quicke on James Bragg Quick's baptism?
Have I got something wrong here? Or Perhaps James Bragg is the name of James Bragg Quick's biological father?
Could someone help me check my research please?
Would really appreciate it.

Thank you for your help :) 

Offline PaulineJ

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 16,314
    • View Profile
Re: Ann Sharland
« Reply #1 on: Monday 15 November 21 14:23 GMT (UK) »
Are you going to end up with the same level of genetic material if Ann were the daughter of William & Ann?
All census look up transcriptions are Crown Copyright http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/
======================================
We are not a search engine. We are human beings.

Offline gilbertlouise

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 51
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Ann Sharland
« Reply #2 on: Monday 15 November 21 15:14 GMT (UK) »
That would make Ann Quicke, James' sister and not parent?
It's something to think about, but I don't think other documents such as census records would tally that up.
Thank you for the thought.

Offline gilbertlouise

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 51
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Ann Sharland
« Reply #3 on: Monday 15 November 21 16:20 GMT (UK) »
Thing is, there is already a daughter of William and Ann called Ann Harriet Quick, but I suppose it is possible that there could be another generation between, age wise, perhaps.

Offline PaulineJ

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 16,314
    • View Profile
Re: Ann Sharland
« Reply #4 on: Monday 15 November 21 17:39 GMT (UK) »
Quote from: gilbertlouise on Monday 15 November 21 15:14 GMT (UK)
That would make Ann Quicke, James' sister and not parent?


No idea what you mean by this.

Pauline
All census look up transcriptions are Crown Copyright http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/
======================================
We are not a search engine. We are human beings.

Offline gilbertlouise

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 51
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Ann Sharland
« Reply #5 on: Monday 15 November 21 20:02 GMT (UK) »
It's ok, I was thinking that's what you meant.
Ann is the mother of James Bragg Quick. If Ann were the daughter of Ann and William, that would make James Bragg Quick her brother, not son.
 But its ok. I realised what you meant after writing what i had.
Pages: [1]