Author Topic: DNA confusion  (Read 1087 times)

Offline decor

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 760
    • View Profile
DNA confusion
« on: Wednesday 12 January 22 15:56 GMT (UK) »
I manage both mine and my mother's account.

My mother has a 162cM match with someone, let's call her Pam.
Pam is her 3rd cousin once removed through Pam's grandfather's paternal side.
162cM is quite a lot for such a match BUT it seems my mother is also more distantly connected to Pam's grandfather's maternal side as well.
Either way, it seems high to me.

I suppose the even weirder bit is: I don't match with this person at all!!!
A 162cM with my mother, but she's not even on my list.

That just doesn't add up to me!  ???


This information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline brigidmac

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 6,013
  • Computer incompetent but stiil trying
    • View Profile
Re: DNA confusion
« Reply #1 on: Wednesday 12 January 22 18:43 GMT (UK) »
Just a quick question do you match both your maternal grandparents sides via DNA not trees .
It is unusual
Roberts,Fellman.Macdermid smith jones,Bloch,Irvine,Hallis Stevenson

Offline decor

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 760
    • View Profile
Re: DNA confusion
« Reply #2 on: Wednesday 12 January 22 19:02 GMT (UK) »
Just a quick question do you match both your maternal grandparents sides via DNA not trees .
It is unusual

Yes, I have matches for all year of my grandparents, as does my mother.
Maybe I should e-mail Ancestry?
This information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline brigidmac

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 6,013
  • Computer incompetent but stiil trying
    • View Profile
Re: DNA confusion
« Reply #3 on: Wednesday 12 January 22 19:27 GMT (UK) »
I think this kind ofanomaly can happen when someone inherits from two sides .
It just means you haven't inherited enough of that family's DNA to show as a match it doesn't mean you don't match at all but maybe under 20cm so not showing as shared match 

Roberts,Fellman.Macdermid smith jones,Bloch,Irvine,Hallis Stevenson


Offline decor

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 760
    • View Profile
Re: DNA confusion
« Reply #4 on: Wednesday 12 January 22 20:21 GMT (UK) »
I think this kind ofanomaly can happen when someone inherits from two sides .
It just means you haven't inherited enough of that family's DNA to show as a match it doesn't mean you don't match at all but maybe under 20cm so not showing as shared match

Thanks for your reply. It's not just that it could be a shared match under 20cM, but I've searched for that person in my DNA list, which I think included matches from 8cM and up. I quite enjoy all the intrigues genealogy throws up ha ha  :)
This information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline brigidmac

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 6,013
  • Computer incompetent but stiil trying
    • View Profile
Re: DNA confusion
« Reply #5 on: Thursday 13 January 22 05:12 GMT (UK) »
Me too .I'm from Leicestershire and know
Both Turi King and Alec Jeffries experts in DNA

I'm a great believer that ethnicity can solve some of the mysteries .

Working on a strange match myself where only common ethnicity is Congo ! 2 percent for one 31 percent for the other . But I suspect
The Swedish + Norwegian ethnic amounts or European and Scottish may come from same ancestor .

Have any of your mother's other relatives tested ? Sometimes a male relative has stronger matches for exams your brother nephew or own son could match this person

Roberts,Fellman.Macdermid smith jones,Bloch,Irvine,Hallis Stevenson

Offline aghadowey

  • RootsChat Honorary
  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 51,361
    • View Profile
Re: DNA confusion
« Reply #6 on: Thursday 13 January 22 10:53 GMT (UK) »
DNA matches are funny things. OH doesn't show a DNA match to a friend (J) we know is related. However, recently a new match (S) for OH turned up and we were easily able to figure out the connection. I've been comparing notes with S trying to sort out more matches in common & expand the family tree back another generation so I asked if they share any DNA with J. Yes, they do but OH doesn't although they are all related.
Away sorting out DNA matches... I may be gone for some time many years!

Offline brigidmac

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 6,013
  • Computer incompetent but stiil trying
    • View Profile
Re: DNA confusion
« Reply #7 on: Thursday 13 January 22 19:48 GMT (UK) »
Aga When you 'know" they are related are you absolutely sure was anyone there at the conception ,births s or hospitals in each generation to check babies werent switched

How close is the relationship   ?
The further apart in generations the more scope for discrepancy on paper tree and or DNA lack of match
Roberts,Fellman.Macdermid smith jones,Bloch,Irvine,Hallis Stevenson

Offline aghadowey

  • RootsChat Honorary
  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 51,361
    • View Profile
Re: DNA confusion
« Reply #8 on: Thursday 13 January 22 20:13 GMT (UK) »
Aga When you 'know" they are related are you absolutely sure was anyone there at the conception ,births s or hospitals in each generation to check babies werent switched

How close is the relationship   ?
The further apart in generations the more scope for discrepancy on paper tree and or DNA lack of match

Births in those days were at home so a baby switch was extremely unlikely. OH & relative J share numerous matches that confirm family records so it's extremely unlikely that they are not related, it's merely that DNA less than 7 centimorgens won't show up in results.
Away sorting out DNA matches... I may be gone for some time many years!