Pages: 1 [2]

Author Topic: John Radford  (Read 524 times)

Offline wivenhoe

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 5,556
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: John Radford
« Reply #9 on: Monday 31 January 22 21:07 GMT (UK) »


How have you identified John RADFORD to be your ancestor if you know so little about him?

Offline Mabel Bagshawe

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 7,864
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: John Radford
« Reply #10 on: Monday 31 January 22 22:07 GMT (UK) »

1881 Sarah Rookley b c1857 is with her parents James & Mary Ann in Kentisbeare. Unmarried. In the household is Edward, a 5 year old grandson

1891 James, Mary Ann and Edward (as Edwin, son) plus other Rookleys are in Newport
         Sarah Dommet is in Newport with John D various children

1901 Edward Rookley in Newport with wife Catherine and 3 year old Annie Maud
        Sarah and children with John Radford

1911 Annie Rookley is enumerated twice, with her parents and as grand-daughter to Sarah Penhallurick in Llantrisant, with a Dommet in the household

it all looks like the same Sarah with ? 3 separate Johns

Offline Mabel Bagshawe

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 7,864
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: John Radford
« Reply #11 on: Monday 31 January 22 22:24 GMT (UK) »
John and Sarah Dommett getting into trouble - his case eventually fell on a technicality and she was acquitted

https://newspapers.library.wales/view/4321530/4321536/73/

The babe in arms is presumably Florence, and she was then pregnant with Eve
Pages: 1 [2]