Author Topic: Differences in cM on Ancestry and gedmatch,  (Read 1179 times)

Offline strictlysnoopy

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 196
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Differences in cM on Ancestry and gedmatch,
« on: Wednesday 02 February 22 21:14 GMT (UK) »
   
    I have a match with a cousin on both Ancestry and Gedmatch. Can somebody explain why there is a difference in cm results. Ancestry gives us a
29cm Gedmatch on the one to many says 44.1 cm largest 18.3 smallest 4.7.

     We cannot at the moment find a common ancestor so with these results can somebody tell me what is our relationship

    Thank you

Offline Ruskie

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 26,198
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Differences in cM on Ancestry and gedmatch,
« Reply #1 on: Wednesday 02 February 22 23:22 GMT (UK) »
Many people use this tool:
https://dnapainter.com/tools/sharedcmv4

Offline Gadget

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 57,138
    • View Profile
Re: Differences in cM on Ancestry and gedmatch,
« Reply #2 on: Wednesday 02 February 22 23:40 GMT (UK) »
Using an algorithm called Timber, Ancestry weights the results to allow for segments that are shared by many people who have ancestors from common geographical areas. See for e.g:

https://whoareyoumadeof.com/blog/what-is-unweighted-shared-dna-on-ancestry/

The unweighted cMs can be found in Ancestry by clicking on the details of the shared DNA in the details of a relative. The discrepancy is usually greater with  lower shared cMs.

e.g      I've just clicked on a random match with a weighted shared cM of 49. The unweighted amount is 59cMS.
 
Add -you can then use the link that Ruskie gives with both results.
Census &  BMD information Crown Copyright www.nationalarchives.gov.uk and GROS - www.scotlandspeople.gov.uk

***Restorers - Please do not use my restores without my permission. Thanks***

Offline Gadget

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 57,138
    • View Profile
Re: Differences in cM on Ancestry and gedmatch,
« Reply #3 on: Thursday 03 February 22 00:51 GMT (UK) »
The red arrow, in the snip below, indicates where to click for the unweighted amount:
Census &  BMD information Crown Copyright www.nationalarchives.gov.uk and GROS - www.scotlandspeople.gov.uk

***Restorers - Please do not use my restores without my permission. Thanks***


Offline strictlysnoopy

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 196
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Differences in cM on Ancestry and gedmatch,
« Reply #4 on: Thursday 03 February 22 13:54 GMT (UK) »


     Awesome Gadget, thank you so much.   'till the next time  ;D

    Regards
   
     Suzanne

Offline LizzieL

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 7,974
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Differences in cM on Ancestry and gedmatch,
« Reply #5 on: Thursday 03 February 22 16:44 GMT (UK) »
Ancestry now cuts off at 8. How many segments do you match.
I have 6th cousin who I don't match according to Ancestry, but do on Gedmatch,
Berks / Oxon: Eltham, Annetts, Wiltshire (surname not county), Hawkins, Pembroke, Partridge
Dorset / Hants: Derham, Stride, Purkiss, Sibley
Yorkshire: Pottage, Carr, Blackburn, Depledge
Sussex: Goodyer, Christopher, Trevatt
Lanark: Scott (soldier went to Jersey CI)
Jersey: Fowler, Huelin, Scott

Offline strictlysnoopy

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 196
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Differences in cM on Ancestry and gedmatch,
« Reply #6 on: Thursday 03 February 22 21:56 GMT (UK) »
 Really new to this DNA, LizzieL. 

    so I will just say that this cousin is a match to 11 other cousins but her ancestors are from another branch which we haven't found.  On Ancestry she is well below my 11 as a distant 4th-6th cousin but on Gematch she is way above all the others.

    best of luck with your research  ;D