My great-grandmother was pregnant when she married Tom and went on to have 2 children, the younger being my grandmother. The marriage broke up around the time of my grandmother's birth in 1905; Tom was apparently abusive, went off with other women, gave her "a disease"
and left town. She found work, and a roof over her head, with a pub landlord (Sam) and in time they fell in love. In 1914 she tried to divorce her husband so that she and Sam could marry -but the judge wouldn't allow the divorce,even though it was uncontested. She and Sam nonetheless stayed together for the rest of their rest of their lives, he brought up the children and although she and the children used her "official" married name on documents, they used Sam's surname in daily life. My grandmother called Sam her father, and my mother knew him as her grandfather, but always felt there was a undercurrent of story that she hadn't been told.
So when I discovered all the above, we thought the skeletons were out of the closet and we had at last identified my grandmother's lineage.
Wrong!
DNA has now shown that in fact Sam (and not the husband) is my biological great grandfather! So Tom wasn't the only errant partner in that marriage, and my gt-grandmother and Sam clearly got together a lot earlier than anyone would admit to
Photos show that my grandmother's older sister was the spitting image of Tom, but the two sisters look nothing whatsoever like each other
That whirring sound in the background must be the noise of them all spinning in their graves, now that this has come out!