Author Topic: The Mystery of Matthew/Martha Kerr (Slamannan)  (Read 990 times)

Offline Lucy_Anywhere

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 10
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: The Mystery of Matthew/Martha Kerr (Slamannan)
« Reply #9 on: Sunday 13 March 22 12:18 GMT (UK) »
There's a Matthew Kerr age 4 on a passenger list in 1910 - Scotland to Quebec.

Hi Milliepede and Carole - thanks for that, but doesn't look like they are the Kerrs I am looking for. Although it would have solved the Matthew mystery!

Offline ColC

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 5,648
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: The Mystery of Matthew/Martha Kerr (Slamannan)
« Reply #10 on: Sunday 13 March 22 14:19 GMT (UK) »
https://civilrecords.irishgenealogy.ie

Birth of MARTHA KERR on 05 August 1907 Newtownards

Mother Lizzie Kerr. No father noted

However I cannot see Martha on the 1911 census in Ireland, too many Lizzies to be certain.

It is possible that Matthew could be with relatives in Scotland but there is no death record.

This may be John’s marriage?

20 August 1891 St Marys RC Church Ballymena

John Kerr a miner age 20, father Robert married Martha Young 17, father John
Witnesses Charles Kelly & Mary Young.

Colin
Clarke, Trickett, Orton, Lawless, Norton, Detheridge, Kirby, Goodfellow, Wagstaff, Lowe, etc.

Offline MaureeninNY

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,314
    • View Profile
Re: The Mystery of Matthew/Martha Kerr (Slamannan)
« Reply #11 on: Sunday 13 March 22 18:59 GMT (UK) »
 I'm sort of leaning towards the wrong gender/name theory.

 Do you know if Martha and James (KELLY) had any children? Someone out there might remember her birthday.

 Maureen

Offline alpinecottage

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,167
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: The Mystery of Matthew/Martha Kerr (Slamannan)
« Reply #12 on: Sunday 13 March 22 19:50 GMT (UK) »
Sometimes babies are born with indeterminate gender - perhaps the baby looked like a boy at birth but became more obviously female as he/she grew.  A name change from Matthew to Martha is relatively subtle.
Did Martha (the daughter) have any children of her own?
Perrins - Manchester and Staffs
Honan - Manchester and Ireland
Hogg - Manchester 19 cent
Anderson - Newcastle mid 19 cent
Boullen - London then Carlisle then Manchester
Comer - Manchester and Galway


Offline MaureeninNY

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,314
    • View Profile
Re: The Mystery of Matthew/Martha Kerr (Slamannan)
« Reply #13 on: Sunday 13 March 22 19:54 GMT (UK) »
I'm sure there are other similar threads:

[Moderator Comment: Topics merged]

Maureen :)

Offline Rosinish

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 14,239
  • PASSED & PAST
    • View Profile
Re: The Mystery of Matthew/Martha Kerr (Slamannan)
« Reply #14 on: Sunday 13 March 22 20:27 GMT (UK) »
It seems to me with an Irish accent the names Matthew & Martha could be mixed up if not heard properly & of course the sex ascribed automatically by name?

Everything from the birth yr, to 1911 census & forward would point to this.

Annie
South Uist, Inverness-shire, Scotland:- Bowie, Campbell, Cumming, Currie

Ireland:- Cullen, Flannigan (Derry), Donahoe/Donaghue (variants) (Cork), McCrate (Tipperary), Mellon, Tol(l)and (Donegal & Tyrone)

Newcastle-on-Tyne/Durham (Northumberland):- Harrison, Jude, Kemp, Lunn, Mellon, Robson, Stirling

Kettering, Northampton:- MacKinnon

Canada:- Callaghan, Cumming, MacPhee

"OLD GENEALOGISTS NEVER DIE - THEY JUST LOSE THEIR CENSUS"

Offline MonicaL

  • RootsChat Honorary
  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 32,605
  • Girl with firewood, Morar 1910 - MEM Donaldson
    • View Profile
Re: The Mystery of Matthew/Martha Kerr (Slamannan)
« Reply #15 on: Sunday 13 March 22 22:00 GMT (UK) »
The Scottish 1921 census is due to be released later this year....at last  ::)

Searching for Martha, this will give you a better guide on her birth date. The census won't include an actual birth date, but age was now required as years and completed months, rather than just years as in previous censuses.

The 1939 Register entry for Martha (only available on application and there is a hefty charge for it) will only give you her age.

Monica
Census information Crown Copyright, www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline Rosinish

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 14,239
  • PASSED & PAST
    • View Profile
Re: The Mystery of Matthew/Martha Kerr (Slamannan)
« Reply #16 on: Sunday 13 March 22 22:20 GMT (UK) »
The 1939 Register entry for Martha (only available on application and there is a hefty charge for it) will only give you her age.

That's interesting Monica as the E/W 1939 Register gives birth dates.

Oh to be able to view ours in Scotland  :(

Annie
South Uist, Inverness-shire, Scotland:- Bowie, Campbell, Cumming, Currie

Ireland:- Cullen, Flannigan (Derry), Donahoe/Donaghue (variants) (Cork), McCrate (Tipperary), Mellon, Tol(l)and (Donegal & Tyrone)

Newcastle-on-Tyne/Durham (Northumberland):- Harrison, Jude, Kemp, Lunn, Mellon, Robson, Stirling

Kettering, Northampton:- MacKinnon

Canada:- Callaghan, Cumming, MacPhee

"OLD GENEALOGISTS NEVER DIE - THEY JUST LOSE THEIR CENSUS"

Offline Lucy_Anywhere

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 10
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: The Mystery of Matthew/Martha Kerr (Slamannan)
« Reply #17 on: Monday 14 March 22 02:29 GMT (UK) »
Thanks, everyone - I really appreciate your insights.

I'm leaning towards it being a clerical error as well - a father with an Irish accent, a hard-of-hearing clerk, etc leading to the wrong name being recorded. Or possibly she looked like a boy at birth and the mistake was corrected by a subtle name change. I don't know if she had any children. I also don't know if they stayed in Scotland or moved down to Lancashire - I'll have to do some more digging.

Colin - yes, that is John and Martha's marriage. They moved over to Scotland shortly afterwards as their first child was born in Livingstone in 1892.

Thanks for pointing me in the direction of that thread, Maureen - I was wondering if this was a problem other people had come across. It just seems like such a huge mistake, but I guess if no one noticed at the time then it was never realised!

Lucy