Author Topic: Genealogy trashed by DNA  (Read 1606 times)

Offline Colleen Johnson

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 7
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Genealogy trashed by DNA
« on: Friday 18 March 22 07:04 GMT (UK) »
Hi,
After well over a year of cross checking DNA results with trees, I am now almost certain that a whole quarter of my tree is wrong.  There was a NPE only a couple of generations back.  All the DNA and other evidence confirms that in my mind.  The question is, what do I do now?  I don't want a legal opinion but a genealogical one.  What does one do with the tree? There must be others out there who have had the same experience after DNA testing. 

Offline Ruskie

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 26,198
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Genealogy trashed by DNA
« Reply #1 on: Friday 18 March 22 08:33 GMT (UK) »
It’s quite a common scenario.

A very similar recent thread:
https://www.rootschat.com/forum/index.php?topic=860023.0

Some people have success tracking down the father of an illegitimate child. That will give you another family to research.


Offline Nanna52

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 925
  • Edwin WB Vincent, my actor, (1881-1940)
    • View Profile
Re: Genealogy trashed by DNA
« Reply #2 on: Friday 18 March 22 09:14 GMT (UK) »
I knew there was a NPE in my recent line so I wasn’t that interested in that line as it was a step relationship.  I did trace back some generations but concentrated on the other lines.
When I had my dna done it provided a whole new line to trace, and it was interesting.  So my tree has both biological line and paper line.  Makes a big tree.  I did this as some of the cousins that I grew up with were from the step fathers line.
James -Victoria, Australia originally from Keynsham, Somerset.
Janes - Keynsham and Bristol area.
Heale/Hale - Keynsham, Somerset
Vincent - Illogan/Redruth, Cornwall.  Moved to Sculcoates, Yorkshire; Grass Valley, California; Timaru, New Zealand and Victoria, Australia.
Williams somewhere in Wales - he kept moving
Ellis - Anglesey

Gedmatch A327531

Offline brigidmac

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 6,013
  • Computer incompetent but stiil trying
    • View Profile
Re: Genealogy trashed by DNA
« Reply #3 on: Friday 18 March 22 12:01 GMT (UK) »
I knew that my grandmother was adopted .her adoptive family are very interesting but not very fertile ...I included as many as possible on my tree . Now have both her birth parents too ...it leads to a very full tree .

Ancestry tree allows for alternative parents and to choose which you put as prefered  .
Roberts,Fellman.Macdermid smith jones,Bloch,Irvine,Hallis Stevenson


Offline Colleen Johnson

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 7
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Genealogy trashed by DNA
« Reply #4 on: Saturday 19 March 22 00:35 GMT (UK) »
Thank you for your responses. They were helpful.  Can anyone tell me how it works with Ancestry - that is introducing another line, but not eliminating the "step" line?

Offline Rosinish

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 14,239
  • PASSED & PAST
    • View Profile
Re: Genealogy trashed by DNA
« Reply #5 on: Saturday 19 March 22 01:19 GMT (UK) »
Do you have a tree on ancestry in order to guide you through it or are you only enquiring as to whether or not adding different parents can actually be done?

Annie
South Uist, Inverness-shire, Scotland:- Bowie, Campbell, Cumming, Currie

Ireland:- Cullen, Flannigan (Derry), Donahoe/Donaghue (variants) (Cork), McCrate (Tipperary), Mellon, Tol(l)and (Donegal & Tyrone)

Newcastle-on-Tyne/Durham (Northumberland):- Harrison, Jude, Kemp, Lunn, Mellon, Robson, Stirling

Kettering, Northampton:- MacKinnon

Canada:- Callaghan, Cumming, MacPhee

"OLD GENEALOGISTS NEVER DIE - THEY JUST LOSE THEIR CENSUS"

Offline Colleen Johnson

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 7
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Genealogy trashed by DNA
« Reply #6 on: Saturday 19 March 22 01:24 GMT (UK) »
I have a tree on Ancestry, and also MyHeritage

Offline Rosinish

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 14,239
  • PASSED & PAST
    • View Profile
Re: Genealogy trashed by DNA
« Reply #7 on: Saturday 19 March 22 01:33 GMT (UK) »
I've never had to add a NPE to my tree (yet)! but...

For each person, if you go to the top right (Edit) with an arrow & dropdown list & click on 'Edit relationships' you can take it from there.

You will be able to add in whatever other details you want/need to but I'd suggest you don't try & do it all in one transaction (if that's the correct word)? but after your changes are confirmed, go back & then add the appropriate info. (if it makes sense)?

Annie
South Uist, Inverness-shire, Scotland:- Bowie, Campbell, Cumming, Currie

Ireland:- Cullen, Flannigan (Derry), Donahoe/Donaghue (variants) (Cork), McCrate (Tipperary), Mellon, Tol(l)and (Donegal & Tyrone)

Newcastle-on-Tyne/Durham (Northumberland):- Harrison, Jude, Kemp, Lunn, Mellon, Robson, Stirling

Kettering, Northampton:- MacKinnon

Canada:- Callaghan, Cumming, MacPhee

"OLD GENEALOGISTS NEVER DIE - THEY JUST LOSE THEIR CENSUS"

Offline Colleen Johnson

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 7
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Genealogy trashed by DNA
« Reply #8 on: Saturday 19 March 22 01:36 GMT (UK) »
Thank you. That does make sense.  I'm not going to jump into this, but it's good to know how to go about it when the time comes - and that will be when there is a family consensus :)