Pages: [1]

Author Topic: army records  (Read 367 times)

Offline silver cloud

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 261
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
army records
« on: Wednesday 13 April 22 15:34 BST (UK) »
Just received some army records, does any one know why it would say discharged services no longer required. Year 1922 R.A.S.C.
Thanks anyone , just trying to understand the record.
Lincolnshire. Cumberland, yorkshire,cornwall, lancashire, essex,

Offline AllanUK

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,265
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: army records
« Reply #1 on: Friday 15 April 22 15:38 BST (UK) »
I believe that King's Regulation, paragraph 392 would be the reason. (image snippet courtesy of military-researcher.co.uk)

Offline ShaunJ

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 24,130
    • View Profile
Re: army records
« Reply #2 on: Friday 15 April 22 15:45 BST (UK) »
Just a bit of army downsizing.
UK Census info. Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline silver cloud

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 261
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: army records
« Reply #3 on: Saturday 16 April 22 05:30 BST (UK) »
Thanks all for your replies, clears up an issue.
 :)
Lincolnshire. Cumberland, yorkshire,cornwall, lancashire, essex,
Pages: [1]