A friend of the Norton family and an attorney at Ramsgate called John Fagg leaves a piece of land with Messuages, Outhouses, etc. (called Robsack) to a Sarah Norton in his Will in 1795.
This same piece of land had been previously owned by two generations of the Norton family before being sold to John Fagg in 1792, which was discussed in this post here:
https://www.rootschat.com/forum/index.php?topic=856511.0I'm wondering if John Fagg could possibly list Sarah Norton in his Will referring to her maiden name Norton instead of her married name.
Sarah Norton (of the Norton family) marries Henry Hodgman in 1767 in Ramsgate before moving to Chatham circa 1771, for around 20 years. After Sarah's husband dies in 1791 in Chatham, Sarah moves back to Ramsgate in 1792 with most of her children.
The Sarah Norton I'm referring to, and her 3 siblings originally inherited the piece of land called Robsack from their grandfather in 1765, before her brother John Norton sells it to John Fagg in 1792.
Note: John Fagg was appointed Sarah's guardian by her grandfather in his Will in 1765. As Sarah's grandfather outlived both her parents.
Would John Fagg be able to list Sarah Norton using her maiden name in his Will in 1795. or would he have to use her married name (if was married)?