What makes you think that? It could be he thought he had to fill out the census return accurately giving his three occupations.
Don't forget what we see is what the enumerator wrote not what the householder wrote as we do in the 1911 census
If you look at the return the enumerator (the person who wrote what we can now see) filled out the persons name as usual on one line, he later scored that out and repeated the name in large letters and put curly brackets around the man's occupation details (a practical step to relate that man to the rest of his family as otherwise it may have been assumed that the next entry was a different household).
Note the enumerator's instructions for the return:-
"2. In the first column, write the No. of the Householder's Schedule you are about to copy, commencing with No. 1 ; in the second column the name of the Road, Street, Square, &c., where the house is situate, and the No. of the house, or any distinctive Name by, which it is known ; then insert in the third column the figure 1 for an Inhabited House, and copy from the Schedule into the other columns all the particulars concerning the persons mentioned therein, making use of any of the authorised contractions (see below), taking especial care to class the ages of MALES and of FEMALES under their PROPER COLUMNS."
Note also the contractions allowed.
full details may be seen at
http://www.rootschat.com/links/01rdn/ Cheers
Guy
