Author Topic: Missing birth at Leominster  (Read 651 times)

Online heywood

  • RootsChat Honorary
  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 40,867
    • View Profile
Re: Missing birth at Leominster
« Reply #9 on: Saturday 05 November 22 19:15 GMT (UK) »
It is quite confusing. The baptism shows parents Charles and Ann.

There are Roberts/Goodman births in Leominster

Mira 1839
Elizabeth 1842
Henry 1844
Pemmelia 1847

These are at 1851 1981/357/4  (no Mira) with parents William and Elizabeth so are they the wrong family?
Census Information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Online Jebber

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 5,388
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Missing birth at Leominster
« Reply #10 on: Saturday 05 November 22 20:06 GMT (UK) »
Charles ROBERTS and Anne MOOR in Orleton 9 July 1823, Charles was from Elton.

They had five children Baptised in Orleton before Mira and Mary. Henry 1824, James 1826, Benjamin 1828, Sarah 1830 and  Anne 1833. Have you found all of them in the Census?
CHOULES All ,  COKER Harwich Essex & Rochester Kent 
COLE Gt. Oakley, & Lt. Oakley, Essex.
DUNCAN Kent
EVERITT Colchester,  Dovercourt & Harwich Essex
GULLIVER/GULLOFER Fifehead Magdalen Dorset
HORSCROFT Kent.
KING Sturminster Newton, Dorset. MONK Odiham Ham.
SCOTT Wrabness, Essex
WILKINS Stour Provost, Dorset.
WICKHAM All in North Essex.
WICKHAM Medway Towns, Kent from 1880
WICKHAM, Ipswich, Suffolk.

Offline Mhairi28

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 99
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Missing birth at Leominster
« Reply #11 on: Saturday 05 November 22 20:11 GMT (UK) »
If the 1839 record refers to Mira Roberts with the parents Roberts / Goodman it would make sense. However it would mean that neither of the girls born to Charles and Ann had been officially registered in Leominster.
So far I have not found any other births under the names of Roberts or Berry.

Offline Mhairi28

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 99
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Missing birth at Leominster
« Reply #12 on: Saturday 05 November 22 20:14 GMT (UK) »
Thank you, I have found the other children for Charles and Ann mn Moor. However Charles seems to disappear as far as the census records are concerned. There are several unexplained goings on with this family which I am trying to unravel.


Online heywood

  • RootsChat Honorary
  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 40,867
    • View Profile
Re: Missing birth at Leominster
« Reply #13 on: Saturday 05 November 22 20:15 GMT (UK) »
William and Elizabeth’s (Goodman) daughter has been transcribed as Anne in 1851 but it is difficult to read.
1841 she is Amira so not your family and that would not be your Mira’s birth.
Census Information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline Mhairi28

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 99
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Missing birth at Leominster
« Reply #14 on: Sunday 06 November 22 16:50 GMT (UK) »
Well now we have established there were two Mira Roberts, born around this time, which is a little surprising. I have found no records for 'my' Mira and Mary apart from their baptism in 1840.

In 1841 they appear to be living with an Elizabeth Roberts. This could be their aunt, but I cannot find their mother Ann. Charles is also not around although there is one recorded at Elton which might fit, although he is described as a thatcher, which does not.

In 1851 Ann reappears as a widow and servant in the Berry household. Here Mira and Mary are listed as the daughters of James Berry.

In 1861 Mira is a servant to Richard Fewtrell and living 2 doors away from Ann.
Mira Roberts marries George Fewtrell in1866 but does not record her father's name on the marriage certificate.

Her other siblings are also missing from the household in 1841 and I know Benjamin aged 12 was living in Worcestershire. He marries in 1851 and does record his father's name. It does not say Charles was deceased.

As I said, several problems to unravel.
Thank you everyone for your interest.

Online Jebber

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 5,388
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Missing birth at Leominster
« Reply #15 on: Sunday 06 November 22 17:56 GMT (UK) »
It's quite possible that their births were not registered, it was very early in the days of registration and it's not unusual to find births were not registered.
CHOULES All ,  COKER Harwich Essex & Rochester Kent 
COLE Gt. Oakley, & Lt. Oakley, Essex.
DUNCAN Kent
EVERITT Colchester,  Dovercourt & Harwich Essex
GULLIVER/GULLOFER Fifehead Magdalen Dorset
HORSCROFT Kent.
KING Sturminster Newton, Dorset. MONK Odiham Ham.
SCOTT Wrabness, Essex
WILKINS Stour Provost, Dorset.
WICKHAM All in North Essex.
WICKHAM Medway Towns, Kent from 1880
WICKHAM, Ipswich, Suffolk.

Offline Mhairi28

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 99
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Missing birth at Leominster
« Reply #16 on: Sunday 06 November 22 18:37 GMT (UK) »
Yes, it would seem the most likely answer, especially as literacy was so low at this time.

On reflection and checking his marriage record I see Benjamin only 'made his mark'. Since he left home at such an early age he may not have known when his father died for the same reason.

It still seems strange that Mira didn't know her father's name even if he died when she was young.


Offline Mabel Bagshawe

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 7,862
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Missing birth at Leominster
« Reply #17 on: Sunday 06 November 22 21:51 GMT (UK) »

In 1841 they appear to be living with an Elizabeth Roberts. This could be their aunt, but I cannot find their mother Ann. Charles is also not around although there is one recorded at Elton which might fit, although he is described as a thatcher, which does not.


did you notice that immediately above Elizabeth Roberts, Mary & Mira, although marked as a different household, is James Berry ?