Author Topic: Taylor Puzzle  (Read 185 times)

Offline loggaman

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 201
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Taylor Puzzle
« on: Wednesday 25 January 23 05:57 GMT (UK) »
I have a Beatrice Taylor ch 12 Nov 1876 she appears on family census 1881 and 1891 , possibly a visitor on 1901 census , then I pick her up on the 1911 census where she is now Beatrice Ashton with a child Mary Kathleen Ashton 3yrs old born Hull ,the census says she had been married 5 years (1906+-)also on the census is her mother Frances Caroline Clark/Taylor who is classed as a visitor all the addresses match up OK. Never found a husband or marriage in that name. Mother FC Clark died 1922 and her probate mentions Beatrice Ashton as a spinster along with her sister Edith Gertrude Gill nee Taylor.
Beatrice married Percy Brook 1923 and the child became Mary Kathleen Brook , on the birth transcript as well as Ashton and was mentioned in Beatrice Taylor / Brooks probate as a spinster.
My questions are can she be married and still be a spinster? Ive researched the marriage for so long with no results ,there is a Beatrice Taylor marrying a Fred Ashton 1906 but its not my Beatrice ,dates wrong,father wrong my father is Alfred Herbert Taylor. Is it possible to marry and be divorced without any records? Thanks Alex
Gill McIntosh Niven Forbes Taylor Munro (Mainly NE Scotland)

Gould Millar Goddard Watkins Walkden  Bernard Collins Sherriff Tempest
From all over

Offline amondg

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 6,491
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Taylor Puzzle
« Reply #1 on: Wednesday 25 January 23 06:10 GMT (UK) »
She may have changed her name to that of the child's father to appear married.

Mary Kathleen Ashton (not Mary Kate) re 1911 was registered as Mary Kathleen TAYLOR, September quarter 1907 Hull. Vol 09D page 282.

There is no mothers maiden name listed so illegitimate.

If you get a copy of the certificate it will confirm her mother's name.

Ref: GRO Index

Offline loggaman

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 201
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Taylor Puzzle
« Reply #2 on: Wednesday 25 January 23 06:53 GMT (UK) »
She may have changed her name to that of the child's father to appear married.

Mary Kathleen Ashton (not Mary Kate) re 1911 was registered as Mary Kathleen TAYLOR, September quarter 1907 Hull. Vol 09D page 282.

There is no mothers maiden name listed so illegitimate.

If you get a copy of the certificate it will confirm her mother's name.

Ref: GRO Index
Yes looks good , probably spending too much time on the marriage which Im coming to agree I dont think it exists. Im sure of the mother daughter thing its definitely them. Not sure where the Kate came from I had Kathleen further down, I got her DoB from the 1939 register. Thanks for the help.
Gill McIntosh Niven Forbes Taylor Munro (Mainly NE Scotland)

Gould Millar Goddard Watkins Walkden  Bernard Collins Sherriff Tempest
From all over

Offline loggaman

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 201
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Taylor Puzzle
« Reply #3 on: Wednesday 25 January 23 06:57 GMT (UK) »
So if Mary Kathleen was illegitimate then there couldn't have been a marriage the year before she was born so I guess its case closed and move on.
Gill McIntosh Niven Forbes Taylor Munro (Mainly NE Scotland)

Gould Millar Goddard Watkins Walkden  Bernard Collins Sherriff Tempest
From all over