new to Genealogy (12 weeks) Great grandmothers parents

[heywood]

Here we are
Thomas Henry Jackson 1856 Salford mmn Davies

What do you think?

[mckha489]

Yes, I think so,
And is this Sarah’s death?

JACKSON, SARAH  DAVIS     31 
GRO Reference: 1857  J Quarter in SALFORD  Volume 08D  Page 56

Added.
Burial is on Ancestry. Died May 29  buried 31st
Her address 9 Regent Road, Salford.
Cod, Disease of the Liver.

[Neale1961]

His name was Andrew ( not Thomas Henry )
Henry claimed to be a bachelor when he married Mary Edwards.

A better option - this burial would fit with Sarah being age 28 in the 1861 census

Burial: 3 Dec 1861 St Catherine, Barton upon Irwell, Lancashire, England
Sarah Davies -
    Age: 29 years
    Abode: Salford
    Buried by: R. Hill
    Register: Burials 1844 - 1887, Page 39, Entry 309
    Source: Manchester Central Library 

ADDED - Here is her grave (Along with members of the Hedges family - her employer)
https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/138645506/sarah-davies

[heywood]

Now that’s what I thought - I knew I had seen ‘Davis’ somewhere.

However, 1861 has Margaret J, 6 months born Salford.

1871 4017 /108/28
 Margaret Jackson 10yrs with Andrew and Mary is born Manchester.

Margaret Jane Jackson b 1860, Manchester mmn Davies

Same census
Robert Jackson b 1862, Salford has mmn Edwards

[heywood]

‘His name was Andrew ( not Thomas Henry ) and he claimed to be a bachelor when he married Mary Edwards’

I am referring to the child, Thomas H in 1861 with parents Andrew and Mary

[mckha489]

Perhaps Andrew registered the birth of Margaret Jane and got muddled.

[Neale1961]

‘His name was Andrew ( not Thomas Henry ) and he claimed to be a bachelor when he married Mary Edwards’

I am referring to the child, Thomas H in 1861 with parents Andrew and Mary

Sorry - was away thinking elsewhere. 

[heywood]

Perhaps Andrew registered the birth of Margaret Jane and got muddled.

Yes, perhaps.

I can’t see a baptism but there is one - 1865 for Mary Jackson mmn Edwards (births).
She is not with the family in 1871 and there is a possible infant death.

[Ploppy123]

Good afternoon Monica,  Thanks for your assistance.  I dont feel confident about the Spotland link just now.  The link from Neal1961 seems much more plausible and going down that line for now.  Probably totally wrong!!