Hi all,
We all know what family lore is like, right? Often things are exaggerated so much that really the truth is tiny in proportion. I've got a similar situation here.
My ancestor Thomas Kelly, from Dunlavin, Co. Wicklow, Ireland c.1819 joined the British Army under the 53rd Foot Regiment and was sent to India and modern day Pakistan, where he then joined the 10th Foot Regiment. He was in India from c.1840-1860, until he was medically discharged in Chatham, Kent and went back to Carlow and Dunlavin, Ireland. Eventually they moved to Western Australia, Australia in 1862 due to the health of their children.
At some point between 1839 and 1846, he married Catherine (maiden name unknown). We are not sure if the marriage took place in Ireland or India.
Here's the funny part. Thomas and Catherine (by family lore) are said to have had 16 children, of which only 3 survived. I have managed to find the baptisms of 5 of their children in India and Pakistan, but nowhere near 16.
What I have found so far:
Mary Ann Catherine KELLY- born 11 Aug 1846, baptised 16 Aug 1846 in Meerut, Bengal, India
Thomas Patrick KELLY- born 30 Aug 1848, baptised 16 Sep 1848 in Lahore Garrison, Lahore, Bengal, India (modern day Pakistan)
John KELLY- born 1 Oct 1850, baptised 1 Oct 1850 in Wuzeerabad Garrison, Wuzeerabad, Bengal, India
William Henry KELLY- born 23 Nov 1851, baptised 23 Nov 1851 in Wuzeerabad, Bengal, India
Bernard KELLY- born 9 Apr 1854, baptised 23 Apr 1854 in Lahore, Bengal, India (modern day Pakistan)
(These records are indexed on FindMyPast)
Usually I would think 16 is a bit of an exaggeration, however there were a few things that made me think otherwise.
Two of Thomas and Catherine's children, John and Thomas Patrick, died young. On their burial records (FindMyPast index) it has listed:
John Kelly, died and buried 1 Oct 1850.
Occ: No.7 H.Ms 10' Regt. Ft.
Thomas Patrick Kelly, died Nov 1852. Buried 27 Nov 1852.
Occ: Child 6 Co. H.M. 10' Ft.Does this 'No.7' and 'Child 6' correspond to the amount of children born to the couple? I couldn't figure out what else it could mean. If it does, it means there are at least two more children I haven't yet discovered.
The second point is the Golden Wedding newspaper article of Bernard (Barney) Kelly and his wife, where it mentions Barney's father Thomas:
"When at last the military were disbanded Sergeant Kelly settled in the New Norcia district. There he reared eighteen children."
https://trove.nla.gov.au/newspaper/article/253221192?searchTerm=barney%20kelly%20golden%20weddingThis article was written in 1932 when his son Barney was still alive, so surely Barney would have an inkling at the number of children his parents had? However, this news article states that Thomas and Catherine had their remaining 13 children after their arrival in Western Australia. Unfortunately I cannot find any registered births for the couple following their arrival in WA.
Honestly, I'm a bit perplexed at where to go from here and unsure whether to just leave it as a myth or continue on searching.
Thank you for taking the time to read
EB