Hi brigidmac,
I’ve actually tried searching by location (using Anc*try’s map feature) in the past without much success. My ancestors arrived in Canada between c1820-1870. I believe there were less than 5 DNA matches with folks in Canada. There were perhaps 15 DNA matches with folks in the UK, several in Australia and 70+ matches just with folks in New England (America). (I don’t remember the total amount of American DNA matches [by location] but it could have been close to 150 matches.) I gave up searching by location as I couldn’t find any reason why I had so many American matches.
Since that time, I’ve discovered a possible reason for high American matches. I have numerous matches with people who have Mumfords in their trees - their Mumfords left England and settled in Rhode Island and Virginia during the 1600s. I have not found proof, but I believe my Mumford ancestors were related to the “American” Mumfords. Of course, having Mumfords in the trees could just be a coincidence and I could be related through entirely different lines.
I spent a bit of time tonight searching matches by location. While I didn’t find anything for me or my brother (yet) I was successful finding a distant relative for my mum’s paternal side (in Ireland). I know how we are related as my mum’s second cousin is also a match with this person. So, I have had success after only looking for a couple of hours.
Thank you for mentioning searching by location.
Note: when I can’t sleep, I tend to search for DNA matches for surname and birthplace. Tonight, I used Anc*try’s map search feature. That is how I found my mum’s match.
We’ve had a busy week or so trying to create garden paths with concrete and forms; I suppose I should stop for tonight as we still have more to do tomorrow. Good night for now. Lisa