Author Topic: siblings dna  (Read 421 times)

Offline greyingrey

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,225
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
siblings dna
« on: Monday 26 June 23 19:57 BST (UK) »
I can. understand, as it says in. one link,  that I may not have the same. Dna results as a cousin, but should siblings have the same ethnicity results, please

Online Lisa in California

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 8,384
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.natio
    • View Profile
Re: siblings dna
« Reply #1 on: Monday 26 June 23 21:06 BST (UK) »
I believe due to DNA that we inherit from parents (amounts can vary), and due to a margin of error, etc. our results can be different.  While my brother and I have somewhat similar high percentage results, I have 2% ethnicity from Norway, he has 0%; he has 4% ethnicity from Sweden and Denmark, I have 0%.  I have 5% from Germanic Europe; he doesn’t have any.

My sister-in-law and her two sisters also have varying results.  In their family, I believe the differences are much greater than the minuscule differences between my brother and me.

I’m sure someone will come along who can correctly and eloquently state facts.   ;)  (Apologies if I’ve mislead you.)

Added: I don’t know if this is true with others or just something odd on my part, but my brother seems to have inherited a higher percentage of DNA from our paternal side, and I seem to have inherited a higher percentage from our maternal side.  But, perhaps it’s just due to a margin of error in reading results.
Ellison: Co. Wicklow/Canada       Fowley: Sligo/Canada       Furnival: Lancashire/Canada       Ibbotson: Sheffield/Canada       Lee/DeJongh: Lancashire & Cheshire       Mumford: Essex/Canada       Ovens: Ireland/Canada       Sarge: Yorkshire/Canada             Stuart: Sligo/Canada       Sullivan: Co. Clare/Canada      Vaus: Sussex/Surrey      Wakefield: Tuam or Ballinasloe, Ireland              (Surname: Originated/Place Last Lived)  (Canadians lived in Ontario)

Offline phil57

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 644
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: siblings dna
« Reply #2 on: Tuesday 27 June 23 09:20 BST (UK) »
I can. understand, as it says in. one link,  that I may not have the same. Dna results as a cousin, but should siblings have the same ethnicity results, please
No, because they can each inherit different segments of their parents DNA, and will almost certainly do so unless they are identical twins, the allocation to ethnicity regions will likely also vary. Bear in mind also that small percentage allocations are more likely to be false or misattributed, and with different segments of their parents DNA, it is quite possible that a very low percentage match which only one sibling has, might just be random "noise". The percentages that you are presented with are probabilities, so an allocation of a few percent can just as easily mean that there is actually no link to that region at all, and the allocation is false, or that the link may be higher.

You are far better off concentrating on overall segment match lengths to identify family relationships. Their accuracy above 15 - 20 cM is pretty much indisputable, unlike ethnicity guesstimates.
Stokes - London and Essex
Hodges - Somerset
Murden - Notts
Humphries/Humphreys from Montgomeryshire

Offline Biggles50

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 943
    • View Profile
Re: siblings dna
« Reply #3 on: Tuesday 27 June 23 09:31 BST (UK) »
Do read up on how the likes of Ancestry analyse and manipulate their data to provide their ESTIMATES of Ethnicity, all the info is in Ancestry’s Help files.

Their source database is from a series of known locations that are essentially extrapolated in their data manipulation to produce the results.

In this case size matters, and in the grand order of life the source database is imo too small for reliable accurate results.

As I have quoted dozens of times, my Ancestry produced Ethnicity Estimate from 5 years ago is totally different from what it now shows.

Do take screen capture's of your own current Ethnicity Estimates and compare them in a few years time to what will be presented then.


Offline Glen in Tinsel Kni

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,212
  • Scottish Borders
    • View Profile
Re: siblings dna
« Reply #4 on: Tuesday 27 June 23 13:48 BST (UK) »
Plenty of examples on youtube where siblings, twins and triplets have different ethnicity results. Often they are sensationalised stories by news outlets trying to claim dna tests are at best inaccurate and at worst a scam. Few if any bother to explain dna results are estimates and that companies use a database of locations.

Offline greyingrey

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,225
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: siblings dna
« Reply #5 on: Tuesday 27 June 23 16:03 BST (UK) »
thank you...I. have learned a lot and am following your tips to learn. more

Offline TonyV

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 455
  • Expect the unexpected (I forgot to!)
    • View Profile
Re: siblings dna
« Reply #6 on: Friday 30 June 23 20:46 BST (UK) »
Plenty of examples on youtube where siblings, twins and triplets have different ethnicity results. Often they are sensationalised stories by news outlets trying to claim dna tests are at best inaccurate and at worst a scam. Few if any bother to explain dna results are estimates and that companies use a database of locations.

I think that it's more accurate to say that ethnicity estimates are just that i.e. estimates, whereas DNA results are accurate (albeit that low cM matches are quite likely to be false)