Author Topic: The Registry Office in the District of Hartley Wintney  (Read 425 times)

Offline ellenmaggie

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 125
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: The Registry Office in the District of Hartley Wintney
« Reply #9 on: Monday 17 July 23 14:14 BST (UK) »
Thank you all for your replies - Edwin Aldridge was the registrar and William Brooks the Superintendent Registrar according to the wedding certificate.  So I guess Harriet and George went to Odiham to get married.   

Thank you again.

Offline ellenmaggie

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 125
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: The Registry Office in the District of Hartley Wintney
« Reply #10 on: Monday 17 July 23 14:16 BST (UK) »
Which leads me to another question - as they married by licence would there be a record of the reason why they applied for a licence to get married rather than by banns at church?  TIA

Online AlanBoyd

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,572
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: The Registry Office in the District of Hartley Wintney
« Reply #11 on: Monday 17 July 23 14:30 BST (UK) »
I know details of one couple around that time who married at a Registrar: it was a case of a man marrying his deceased wife’s sister, which was still illegal at that time. Presumably it was much easier to keep a marriage low-key if it wasn’t at a church, especially if it involved travelling to a nearby town.

Although I imagine that most people had a live-and-let-live attitude to these circumstances, especially if it meant that children who had lost their mother gained an aunt as their “new mother”.
Boyd, Dove, Blakey, Burdon

Offline ellenmaggie

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 125
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: The Registry Office in the District of Hartley Wintney
« Reply #12 on: Monday 17 July 23 14:35 BST (UK) »
No obvious reason I can see at the moment for the marriage to be at the Registry Office - their first child was born in 1873 and neither had been married before - George was 22 and Harriet 23.  I will do some more investigation of George's side of the family.


Online KGarrad

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 26,106
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: The Registry Office in the District of Hartley Wintney
« Reply #13 on: Monday 17 July 23 14:56 BST (UK) »
I seem to remember that while births and deaths could be registered at a sub-district, marriages had to be done at the central office - probably in front of the superintendent Registrar?
Garrad (Suffolk, Essex, Somerset), Crocker (Somerset), Vanstone (Devon, Jersey), Sims (Wiltshire), Bridger (Kent)

Online AlanBoyd

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,572
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: The Registry Office in the District of Hartley Wintney
« Reply #14 on: Monday 17 July 23 15:09 BST (UK) »
Did the couple name children after parents/ – if not, could be a hint of a family rift.
Boyd, Dove, Blakey, Burdon

Offline ellenmaggie

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 125
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: The Registry Office in the District of Hartley Wintney
« Reply #15 on: Monday 17 July 23 16:33 BST (UK) »
First born son - Herbert John  and first born daughter Lily Jane - second names were the names of George's parents John and Jane Parker.   So would suggest problem on Harriet's side of the family.  She and her sister Ann lost their mother at a very young age and their father never married again.  Ann lived with William until her marriage in 1867 (ie was living with William in 1861) and Harriet must have moved into live with William as she is with him on the 1871 Census.  Harriet was brought up by her uncle and his family.  Maybe William did not want her to marry and leave him.  William ended up living with his older single sister Letitia and was 'kept by' him according to 1891 census.

Online AlanBoyd

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,572
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: The Registry Office in the District of Hartley Wintney
« Reply #16 on: Monday 17 July 23 17:27 BST (UK) »
Apologies if I have missed something: who was William?
Boyd, Dove, Blakey, Burdon

Offline ellenmaggie

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 125
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: The Registry Office in the District of Hartley Wintney
« Reply #17 on: Monday 17 July 23 17:29 BST (UK) »
Oh sorry, Wiliam Rummey was Harriet's father.