Author Topic: Occupation? 17th-century Batley burial BT'S (Read 237 times)

Janet Waterhouse · « **on:** Tuesday 15 August 23 10:30 BST (UK) »

Good morning,

I am struggling with a possible occupation or maybe, unlikely abode, in the following 1641 entry.

Robrt [Robert] Shine Atrunxer bured [buried] May 13 [1641]

The parish register page is missing for this year.

Thank you for taking the time to look.

Regards,

Janet

JenB · « **Reply #1 on:** Tuesday 15 August 23 10:44 BST (UK) »

I think it might perhaps be 'a trouper' i.e. a trooper or private soldier.

mckha489 · « **Reply #2 on:** Tuesday 15 August 23 10:45 BST (UK) »

Trouper.

Redboxed. But posting in support.

maddys52 · « **Reply #3 on:** Tuesday 15 August 23 11:05 BST (UK) »

I agree, I think it looks like "A trouper", guessing it means "trooper".

Janet Waterhouse · « **Reply #4 on:** Tuesday 15 August 23 12:05 BST (UK) »

Thank you to all who responded.

Once explained it becomes obvious.

Regards,

Janet

ShaunJ · « **Reply #5 on:** Tuesday 15 August 23 12:23 BST (UK) »

Hmmm. I'm not sure that there were any full-time professional soldiers in those days. There was certainly no standing army.

fiddlerslass · « **Reply #6 on:** Tuesday 15 August 23 13:18 BST (UK) »

This is what was happening in 1641

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Army_Plots_(1641)

RootsChat.Com

Author Topic: Occupation? 17th-century Batley burial BT'S (Read 237 times)

Janet Waterhouse

Occupation? 17th-century Batley burial BT'S

JenB

Re: Occupation? 17th-century Batley burial BT'S

mckha489

Re: Occupation? 17th-century Batley burial BT'S

maddys52

Re: Occupation? 17th-century Batley burial BT'S

Janet Waterhouse

Re: Occupation? 17th-century Batley burial BT'S

ShaunJ

Re: Occupation? 17th-century Batley burial BT'S

fiddlerslass

Re: Occupation? 17th-century Batley burial BT'S

Your RootsChat

Your Tools

Family History Help