« Reply #11 on: Sunday 03 September 23 19:55 BST (UK) »
Also cases of the sperm donor not bringing up their child.
Bridal pregnancies was very, very common, often to test paternity/trial marriage etc, but we have to allow some cases where the father was another man. For instance if a man gallantly stepped forward for a pregnant woman where the father had fled or died, or the real father decided to marry another woman. If such a man did that, and helped a woman out in a sticky situation, then it makes him very much an ancestor, and he was one of those responsible for your existence.
Such as, for example, in rural Suffolk, Mary Bloggs got pregnant in January 1784, the father was a Joe Soap. In March 1784, Joe found Mary was expecting a baby, so he ran away to London to escape his duty. Mary then met local man James Hamilton (born 1750) and he stepped forward and married Mary in August 1784. Mary had a baby boy called James Hamilton in October 1784. Any descendants of James Hamilton Jnr born Oct 1784 will have Joe Soap as a blood ancestor, but James Hamilton Snr (born 1750) was the father in every way but blood, so should be considered an ancestor of James Hamiton Jnr's descendants.
Researching:
LONDON, Coombs, Roberts, Auber, Helsdon, Fradine, Morin, Goodacre
DORSET Coombs, Munday
NORFOLK Helsdon, Riches, Harbord, Budery
KENT Roberts, Goodacre
SUSSEX Walder, Boniface, Dinnage, Standen, Lee, Botten, Wickham, Jupp
SUFFOLK Titshall, Frost, Fairweather, Mayhew, Archer, Eade, Scarfe
DURHAM Stewart, Musgrave, Wilson, Forster
SCOTLAND Stewart in Selkirk
USA Musgrave, Saix
ESSEX Cornwell, Stock, Quilter, Lawrence, Whale, Clift
OXON Edgington, Smith, Inkpen, Snell, Batten, Brain