Author Topic: Tynemouth marriage banns  (Read 630 times)

Offline MiraMax131

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 20
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Tynemouth marriage banns
« on: Thursday 02 November 23 13:56 GMT (UK) »
Can anyone tell me if it’s possible to see tynemouth marriage banns online and if so where.  My mothers great grandfather was William Chambers but we have no further information for him.  We have a marriage record for his daughter Elizabeth (my mothers grandmothers)marriage but it doesn’t state the occupation of her father William. If we had her fathers occupation we may be able to trace him with that.   Would the marriage banns have that information.
Elizabeth chambers was married in Tynemouth to William Lumley on 9th April 1846. thomas Lumley also appears on the marriage certificate but we are not sure how he is related to Elizabeth.  We have no accurate DOB for Elizabeth it varies between 1817 and 1821. 

Online rosie99

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 42,079
  • ALFIE 2009 - 2021 (Rosbercon Sky's the Limit)
    • View Profile
Re: Tynemouth marriage banns
« Reply #1 on: Thursday 02 November 23 14:27 GMT (UK) »
Marriage banns normally only give names of bride and groom, possibly ages/occupation and parish  plus the 3 dates that the banns were called

Elizabeth chambers was married in Tynemouth to William Lumley on 9th April 1846. thomas Lumley also appears on the marriage certificate but we are not sure how he is related to Elizabeth.  We have no accurate DOB for Elizabeth it varies between 1817 and 1821.
Did you mean Thomas Chambers as if he was Lumley is he not a relation of the groom
Census information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Online rosie99

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 42,079
  • ALFIE 2009 - 2021 (Rosbercon Sky's the Limit)
    • View Profile
Re: Tynemouth marriage banns
« Reply #2 on: Thursday 02 November 23 14:30 GMT (UK) »
Where do you have William and Elizabeth in 1851/61

ADDED I see from you earlier post that she married Thomas Lumley not William

https://www.rootschat.com/forum/index.php?topic=839276.0
Census information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline JenB

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 16,877
    • View Profile
Re: Tynemouth marriage banns
« Reply #3 on: Thursday 02 November 23 14:39 GMT (UK) »
We have a marriage record for his daughter Elizabeth (my mothers grandmothers)marriage but it doesn’t state the occupation of her father William.

Just to clarify - you are saying that the section of the certificate for the father's occupation has been left blank?
All Census Look Ups Are Crown Copyright from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk


Offline Galium

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,094
    • View Profile
Re: Tynemouth marriage banns
« Reply #4 on: Thursday 02 November 23 14:52 GMT (UK) »
Marriage banns don't normally give details other than the couple's names and places of residence, so you wouldn't get details of Elizabeth's father from there. 
Why do you think that Elizabeth Chambers is not the child baptised in South Shields in 1817, daughter of William Chambers, shipwright? 

UK Census info. Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline JenB

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 16,877
    • View Profile
Re: Tynemouth marriage banns
« Reply #5 on: Thursday 02 November 23 15:37 GMT (UK) »
When you say you've got a marriage record which doesn't include the bride's father's occupation are you referring to this one?
https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:S3HT-DC13-GS2?i=533
This is pre-1837 parish register format for marriages.

If this is the document you mention, please take another look at my posting here on your earlier thread on the same topic.
https://www.rootschat.com/forum/index.php?topic=839276.msg7050853#msg7050853
At this time this church was, for some reason, still recording marriages in the old pre-1837 format as well as the 'new' format (which did include occupations). But only the 'old' format is shown on Family Search.

A certificate from the GRO will have a section for occupations.
All Census Look Ups Are Crown Copyright from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline Milliepede

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 15,289
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Tynemouth marriage banns
« Reply #6 on: Thursday 02 November 23 16:13 GMT (UK) »
1841 has an Ann Chambers 25 and Elizabeth Chambers 20 in Westoe Durham.

Ann could be her sister, if any further records come up for Ann it might help with her father.
Hinchliffe - Huddersfield Wiltshire
Burroughs - Arlingham Glos
Pick - Frocester Glos

Offline JenB

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 16,877
    • View Profile
Re: Tynemouth marriage banns
« Reply #7 on: Thursday 02 November 23 16:17 GMT (UK) »
1841 has an Ann Chambers 25 and Elizabeth Chambers 20 in Westoe Durham.

Ann could be her sister, if any further records come up for Ann it might help with her father.

I think I’m right in saying that that was looked at in the earlier thread  :-\
All Census Look Ups Are Crown Copyright from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline Milliepede

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 15,289
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Tynemouth marriage banns
« Reply #8 on: Thursday 02 November 23 16:19 GMT (UK) »
Ah I didn't look at an earlier thread - noted thanks JenB. 
Hinchliffe - Huddersfield Wiltshire
Burroughs - Arlingham Glos
Pick - Frocester Glos