Author Topic: Convention for who was where in c 1916 wedding photos  (Read 578 times)

Offline Mildred298

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 26
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Convention for who was where in c 1916 wedding photos
« on: Wednesday 08 November 23 10:11 GMT (UK) »
Can anyone help with the convention or tradition for where people were positioned in wedding photos from around 1916?
I have two family wedding photos from this period and have been trying to identify more of those in the photos, possibly from their position.

Offline McGroger

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,731
  • Convicts, Commoners and Outlaws
    • View Profile
Re: Convention for who was where in c 1916 wedding photos
« Reply #1 on: Saturday 11 November 23 20:18 GMT (UK) »
Welcome to Rootschat, Mildred. :)
A "convention" as you put it would require a long and involved explanation and even then might not cover your specific photos. Would you mind posting your photos on here? The seasoned experts could then give their opinions as to the relationships.
Peter
Convicts: COSIER (1791); LEADBEATER (1791); SINGLETON (& PARKINSON) (1792); STROUD (1793); BARNES (aka SYDNEY) (1800); DAVIS (1804); CLARK (1806); TYLER (1810); COWEN (1818); ADAMS[ON] (1821); SMITH (1827); WHYBURN (1827); HARBORNE (1828).
Commoners: DOUGAN (1844); FORD (1849); JOHNSTON (1850); BEATTIE (& LONG) (1856); BRICKLEY (1883).
Outlaws: MCGREGOR (1883) & ass. clans, Glasgow, Glenquaich, Glenalmond and Glengyle.

Online Jebber

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 5,388
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Convention for who was where in c 1916 wedding photos
« Reply #2 on: Saturday 11 November 23 20:52 GMT (UK) »
Traditionally the couples parents stood next to the happy couple, the Bride's father with the groom's mother and the groom's father with the Bride's mother. Then the grandparents, the best man with the maid of honour then any bridesmaids and any adult siblings of the couple.  Not everyone followed convention, so that is only a rough guide.
CHOULES All ,  COKER Harwich Essex & Rochester Kent 
COLE Gt. Oakley, & Lt. Oakley, Essex.
DUNCAN Kent
EVERITT Colchester,  Dovercourt & Harwich Essex
GULLIVER/GULLOFER Fifehead Magdalen Dorset
HORSCROFT Kent.
KING Sturminster Newton, Dorset. MONK Odiham Ham.
SCOTT Wrabness, Essex
WILKINS Stour Provost, Dorset.
WICKHAM All in North Essex.
WICKHAM Medway Towns, Kent from 1880
WICKHAM, Ipswich, Suffolk.

Offline Mildred298

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 26
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Convention for who was where in c 1916 wedding photos
« Reply #3 on: Sunday 12 November 23 13:50 GMT (UK) »
Here is one of the photos. As I say, I know who the married couple are and one or two others. Any help with the relationships of others would be useful.
Mildred


Offline Mildred298

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 26
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Convention for who was where in c 1916 wedding photos
« Reply #4 on: Saturday 18 November 23 12:37 GMT (UK) »
Please note I only see a small part of the picture when I first look. The whole picture is there but you have to scan across.

Offline Milliepede

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 15,289
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Convention for who was where in c 1916 wedding photos
« Reply #5 on: Saturday 18 November 23 16:11 GMT (UK) »
Quote
I know who the married couple are

You could find an exact date if you have their names - or when the marriage was registered.

It can help to know if their parents or older relatives were alive at the time for example to rule them out being in the photo.
Hinchliffe - Huddersfield Wiltshire
Burroughs - Arlingham Glos
Pick - Frocester Glos

Offline Mildred298

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 26
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Convention for who was where in c 1916 wedding photos
« Reply #6 on: Saturday 18 November 23 17:23 GMT (UK) »
Thanks,
I know the exact marriage date and also I know of several of the people who were probably there but just can't identify other ones they might be present. I was hoping a position convention might help me get an idea of who is who.

Offline jmagarac

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 155
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Convention for who was where in c 1916 wedding photos
« Reply #7 on: Tuesday 28 November 23 20:44 GMT (UK) »
One gentleman jumped out at me. At first I thought he had a cigarette in his mouth - but gigar"ettes" weren't the fashion of the day (and nobody else is smoking). AND then I thought maybe it was drawn it... and then I concluded it "must be a scratch." Was that a scratch?

Offline Mildred298

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 26
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Convention for who was where in c 1916 wedding photos
« Reply #8 on: Wednesday 29 November 23 13:45 GMT (UK) »
I've looked at the original and yes it's a mark on the photo. I'm guessing he's a relative of the brides family and the groom's family are mostly on the bride's side of the photo.
My dad is the youngest boy with the arm of my aunt around him at the front. My Nan is the lady next to the man with the mark on the photo, her husband, my Grandad, is in the back row.
Thanks