Author Topic: John Williams Burgess & George Williams Burgess  (Read 379 times)

Offline AMBLY

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 8,986
    • View Profile
Re: John Williams Burgess & George Williams Burgess
« Reply #9 on: Tuesday 19 December 23 00:44 GMT (UK) »
John Williams Burgess - Williams - with the s.
Noting his two children definitively have Williams as a middle name:
May Williams Burgess 1892
John Williams Burgess 1897

Doubly denotes "Williams" is someone's surname and important enough to John that it be 'carried' down?

 Cheers
AMBLY
Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

"Now that we're all here, I'm not sure if we're all there...."

 Entre los individuos, como entre las naciones, el respeto al derecho ajeno es la paz
 Among individuals, as among nations, respect for the rights of others is peace
    ~Benito Juarez (1806-1872)

Offline Gadget

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 57,138
    • View Profile
Re: John Williams Burgess & George Williams Burgess
« Reply #10 on: Tuesday 19 December 23 10:10 GMT (UK) »
That's what I had thought, Ambly  :)

contd...

The fact that John can't be found in the 71 and 81, suggests that he might have been called by a different surname - John Williams  or ??
Census &  BMD information Crown Copyright www.nationalarchives.gov.uk and GROS - www.scotlandspeople.gov.uk

***Restorers - Please do not use my restores without my permission. Thanks***

Offline Gadget

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 57,138
    • View Profile
Re: John Williams Burgess & George Williams Burgess
« Reply #11 on: Tuesday 19 December 23 11:07 GMT (UK) »
I see that John was a labour living in Ince on his marriage cert. Also, a Samuel Nield was a witness.
In the 1891 census, there is a Samuel Nield, 46, living in Ince. He was a labourer M.S.C.

RG12/2868/15/3

I'm not sure what M.S.C. stands for but could it be that John and Samuel were work mates?

Gadget
Census &  BMD information Crown Copyright www.nationalarchives.gov.uk and GROS - www.scotlandspeople.gov.uk

***Restorers - Please do not use my restores without my permission. Thanks***

Offline Gadget

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 57,138
    • View Profile
Re: John Williams Burgess & George Williams Burgess
« Reply #12 on: Tuesday 19 December 23 12:45 GMT (UK) »
I think that M.S.C. was  Manchester Shipping Canal

https://www.dredgepoint.org/dredging-database/equipment/msc-ince
Census &  BMD information Crown Copyright www.nationalarchives.gov.uk and GROS - www.scotlandspeople.gov.uk

***Restorers - Please do not use my restores without my permission. Thanks***


Offline markoid1

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 67
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: John Williams Burgess & George Williams Burgess
« Reply #13 on: Tuesday 19 December 23 18:39 GMT (UK) »
I think that M.S.C. was  Manchester Shipping Canal

https://www.dredgepoint.org/dredging-database/equipment/msc-ince

Thanks Gadget. It was indeed the canal.

I’ve spent over 10 years on this one, but am enjoying the theory related to Hannah the most. Particularly as Hannah was from Staffordshire and John changed his place of birth to Staffordshire on the 1921 census.

I’m hoping I’ll get a DNA breakthrough on this line one day.

Meantime, thanks for the searches and information - really appreciate it.

Offline Gadget

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 57,138
    • View Profile
Re: John Williams Burgess & George Williams Burgess
« Reply #14 on: Tuesday 19 December 23 19:18 GMT (UK) »
There are a couple of interesting households in the 1841 for Burgess families. They are on consecutive pages -John Burgess and Hannah Burgess  and others as one household and a George Burgess and Mary in another household.

HO107/986/6/33/24

HO107/986/6/32/23

 

Gadget
Census &  BMD information Crown Copyright www.nationalarchives.gov.uk and GROS - www.scotlandspeople.gov.uk

***Restorers - Please do not use my restores without my permission. Thanks***