Hi Robert
That's really kind of you and I would love to take up your offer. I have a William Blundell marry a Mary Coot in Binsted on 4 May 1724 yet I cannot find any Blundells before that date in Binsted so the chances are he didn't come from there originally. However when I looked at the marriage details it said they were both of the parish. Would that mean they had been granted settlement rights, is that how it worked?
I can find a Mary Coot, baptised in Coates cum Burton in 1698 and the only William Blundell I can find is one baptised in Slindon in 1678, which would make him about 46 when he married. Quite old for those days but I don't think he lived for many years after he was married. A William Blundell was buried in Binsted 1732, but I'm not sure if that was him or his son. The parish register pages were in a terrible state and are really hard to read on the microfiche. I had popped down to Chichester early on in my research.
They had four children, John , William, Mary and Richard, between 1724 and 1731, which makes me think that it was William snr who was buried in 1732.
As with my previous postings, I'm trying to see if Richard was the same Richard Blundell who married in Stedham in 1769 and settled in Selham are one & the same. There are no settlement records that have survived for Selham. I'm hoping you may have a better copy of the Parish Registry than I looked at. Any information on them would be gratefully received.
Jan