Author Topic: 1891 census  (Read 1596 times)

Offline chempat

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 8,568
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
1891 census
« on: Monday 05 February 24 08:19 GMT (UK) »
On 31st March 1891 Edward Brooks, a corporal of Chatham Barracks age 28, born Cheltenham, was given leave to marry Fanny Maud Mary Adcock 27 of Plantation Road in Oxford (father James a waiter).  Their first daughter was born on 29th December 1891 in Headington.  Edward was 'at home' in this country from before the marriage until discharged in 1903.

Can anyone see them in 1891 census? They are not with her widowed mother and family. I thought they might be on the seas but there is definitely no indication that he travelled abroad again.

Thanks

Offline ColC

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 5,620
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: 1891 census
« Reply #1 on: Monday 05 February 24 10:58 GMT (UK) »
Were they actually married when the 1891 census 5 April took place?

Marriages Mar 1891   
Brooks    Edward        Headington    3a   1011

Adcock    Fanny Maude M   

Headington spans the boundaries of the counties of Oxfordshire and Buckinghamshire.

Colin
Clarke, Trickett, Orton, Lawless, Norton, Detheridge, Kirby, Goodfellow, Wagstaff, Lowe, etc.

Offline rosie17

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 10,094
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: 1891 census
« Reply #2 on: Monday 05 February 24 11:18 GMT (UK) »
I think they are most probably away some where as he was still in the army have you checked his enlistment records ? .

Rosie

Offline Comberton

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,997
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: 1891 census
« Reply #3 on: Monday 05 February 24 11:21 GMT (UK) »
The marriage is announced in the newspaper, I  only have free search
Oxfordshire Weekly News 8 April 1891
The other couple from the index seem to have married on the 30th.


Offline rosie17

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 10,094
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: 1891 census
« Reply #4 on: Monday 05 February 24 11:35 GMT (UK) »
The marriage is on Ancestry and dated 30 march 1891 St Philip& St James Oxford
Address for  Edward is Chatham Barracks as posted

Rosie

Offline chempat

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 8,568
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: 1891 census
« Reply #5 on: Monday 05 February 24 15:45 GMT (UK) »
Edward and Fanny married on Monday, 30th March - sorry I do not know why I wrote 31st - for which he had obtained official leave.  His records state that he stayed in this country and did not travel abroad thereafter.  Census day was the following Sunday so I would guess that they would be back in barracks, or close to, by that date.

Offline rosie17

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 10,094
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: 1891 census
« Reply #6 on: Tuesday 06 February 24 08:29 GMT (UK) »
They are hiding well only thing I can think on maybe they had been away somewhere and missed of the census  ???..

Rosie

Offline chempat

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 8,568
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: 1891 census
« Reply #7 on: Tuesday 06 February 24 09:11 GMT (UK) »
Yes, I agree. I even went through pages and pages of some of the Barracks on Ancestry and FindMyPast just in case something was a horrible scribble but nothing likely.

Offline rosie17

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 10,094
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: 1891 census
« Reply #8 on: Tuesday 06 February 24 12:49 GMT (UK) »
Yes trailed through a few myself checked Scotland as well another thought I had was maybe they were in Ireland ?

Rosie