Author Topic: Parents' names on burial for 39-year-old man (Cumberworth 1832)  (Read 694 times)

Offline nicholastolson

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 65
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Parents' names on burial for 39-year-old man (Cumberworth 1832)
« Reply #9 on: Wednesday 14 February 24 01:25 GMT (UK) »
Thanks, dobfarm, but I'm on Ancestry so already have this information. My query is not so much about John Kilner himself, more about the practice of naming the parents of the deceased and whether this implies that they were single - the deceased, not the parents ;-)

Offline dobfarm

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 7,793
  • Scarcliffe village Derbyshire
    • View Profile
Re: Parents' names on burial for 39-year-old man (Cumberworth 1832)
« Reply #10 on: Wednesday 14 February 24 10:36 GMT (UK) »
Hi Nich

What I posted this info for was the records of births in Hull and baptisms in Huddersfield ?, lot of genealogy is elimination by proving a marriage to a person or 2 different people with same name in the same time period one married and one single - Location of the ancestors abodes helps proving true identities

I found LDS IGI Familysearch  is often is a good accurate website (Though they have LDS trees as well but not as many)  and not full of gap filling assumptions of imagination - also in old records and parish registers in centuries past more so - also  ancestry website trees and other stuff.

Assume nothing ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ check all.  ;)
Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
Any transcription of information does not identify or prove anything.
Intended as a Guide only in ancestry research.-It is up to the reader as to any Judgment of assessments of information given! to check from original sources.

In my opinion the marriage residence is not always the place of birth. Never forget Workhouse and overseers accounts records of birth

Offline BumbleB

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 14,307
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Parents' names on burial for 39-year-old man (Cumberworth 1832)
« Reply #11 on: Wednesday 14 February 24 11:27 GMT (UK) »
Just wondering whether the incumbent at St Nicholas had had previous knowledge of Reverend Dade.  Dade registers from 1775 to 1812 for baptisms and burials listed parents.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Dade
Transcriptions and NBI are merely finding aids.  They are NOT a substitute for original record entries.
Remember - "They'll be found when they want to be found" !!!
If you don't ask the question, you won't get an answer.
He/she who never made a mistake, never made anything.
Archbell - anywhere, any date
Kendall - WRY
Milner - WRY
Appleyard - WRY

Offline Gibel

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,620
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Parents' names on burial for 39-year-old man (Cumberworth 1832)
« Reply #12 on: Wednesday 14 February 24 12:19 GMT (UK) »
I was just about to post about Dade registers /but I’m interested to see that someone else has the same idea. I’ve checked that Cumberworth isn’t on the list of Dade registers but perhaps the vicar used his own similar system using the ideas of the Revd Dade.


Offline BumbleB

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 14,307
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Parents' names on burial for 39-year-old man (Cumberworth 1832)
« Reply #13 on: Wednesday 14 February 24 12:32 GMT (UK) »
Snap!!!!!  ;D
Transcriptions and NBI are merely finding aids.  They are NOT a substitute for original record entries.
Remember - "They'll be found when they want to be found" !!!
If you don't ask the question, you won't get an answer.
He/she who never made a mistake, never made anything.
Archbell - anywhere, any date
Kendall - WRY
Milner - WRY
Appleyard - WRY