Pages: 1 2 3 [4]

Author Topic: Siegmund Gutmann BOSTON  (Read 847 times)

Offline *Sandra*

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 58,732
  • Marie Curie
    • View Profile
Re: Siegmund Gutmann BOSTON
« Reply #27 on: Wednesday 27 March 24 17:16 GMT (UK) »


Curiosity, may have missed it - but what was the marital status on the remarriage to Alfred Meeks ?
Was she widowed or divorced ?
"We search for information, but the burden of proof is always with the thread owner"

Census information is Crown Copyright  http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

British Census copyright The National Archives; Canadian Census copyright Library and Archives Canada

Offline Ashtone

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,448
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Siegmund Gutmann BOSTON
« Reply #28 on: Wednesday 27 March 24 17:21 GMT (UK) »
Wasn't Mary's marital status in the 1901 census "widow"?

Offline Kay99

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 7,545
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Siegmund Gutmann BOSTON
« Reply #29 on: Wednesday 27 March 24 17:32 GMT (UK) »
I think the 1901 census reads as married?

Kay

Offline Stacey.tree31

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 95
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Siegmund Gutmann BOSTON
« Reply #30 on: Wednesday 27 March 24 17:42 GMT (UK) »
Quote from: *Sandra* on Wednesday 27 March 24 17:16 GMT (UK)


Curiosity, may have missed it - but what was the marital status on the remarriage to Alfred Meeks ?
Was she widowed or divorced ?
We haven't ordered their marriage certificate yet and I have only managed to find their marriage index as of yet

Offline *Sandra*

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 58,732
  • Marie Curie
    • View Profile
Re: Siegmund Gutmann BOSTON
« Reply #31 on: Wednesday 27 March 24 17:50 GMT (UK) »
Quote from: Ashtone on Wednesday 27 March 24 17:21 GMT (UK)
Wasn't Mary's marital status in the 1901 census "widow"?

Not all census (1901 census 31 March 1901)  are correct. Sometimes women used "widowed" as a marital status even when the husband is living.

That would discount the 1902 death record in Marylebone if he'd already passed away.

Catch 22 - the 1909 marriage may confirm she was widowed but that may not have happened by 31 March 1901 but perhaps by quarter 1 of 1902  :-\ :-\

Sorry Kay Didn't see your reply - apologises.
"We search for information, but the burden of proof is always with the thread owner"

Census information is Crown Copyright  http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

British Census copyright The National Archives; Canadian Census copyright Library and Archives Canada

Offline TreeSpirit

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,211
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Siegmund Gutmann BOSTON
« Reply #32 on: Thursday 28 March 24 18:10 GMT (UK) »
I believe that there is a fair chance that he came from Vienna, so I'd be rather suspicious re a German Siegmund  ....

Offline Stacey.tree31

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 95
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Siegmund Gutmann BOSTON
« Reply #33 on: Friday 05 April 24 22:22 BST (UK) »
Quote from: TreeSpirit on Thursday 28 March 24 18:10 GMT (UK)
I believe that there is a fair chance that he came from Vienna, so I'd be rather suspicious re a German Siegmund  ....
Is his name quite a common one in Vienna?

Offline TreeSpirit

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,211
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Siegmund Gutmann BOSTON
« Reply #34 on: Saturday 06 April 24 11:00 BST (UK) »
This is your duplicate topic, .... Have you looked at your original topic yet?
Pages: 1 2 3 [4]