Pages: 1 [2]

Author Topic: Finding female relatives  (Read 924 times)

Online BumbleB

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 14,338
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Finding female relatives
« Reply #9 on: Saturday 04 May 24 11:21 BST (UK) »
Ancestry have the 1937 marriage -

St Thomas, Birmingham - 11 December 1937

John Baker - 21, bachelor, Labourer.  Father - John, Labourer
Marion Brooke - 18, spinster.  Father -  Joseph, deceased.

Witnesses - John Brooke and Albert Edward ?Brooke?

Transcriptions and NBI are merely finding aids.  They are NOT a substitute for original record entries.
Remember - "They'll be found when they want to be found" !!!
If you don't ask the question, you won't get an answer.
He/she who never made a mistake, never made anything.
Archbell - anywhere, any date
Kendall - WRY
Milner - WRY
Appleyard - WRY

Offline carol8353

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 17,598
  • Me,mum and dad and both gran's c 1955
    • View Profile
Re: Finding female relatives
« Reply #10 on: Saturday 04 May 24 11:43 BST (UK) »
Quote from: BumbleB on Saturday 04 May 24 11:13 BST (UK)
1939 - there is Marian Baker with the 1919 birth date, with husband, Jack, plus a daughter with mmn of Brooke, and one redacted entry.  All in Birmingham.

I did sort of give that info on reply number 3, but didn't think we were allowed to give away too much info from the 1939 register.
Census information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Online BumbleB

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 14,338
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Finding female relatives
« Reply #11 on: Saturday 04 May 24 11:49 BST (UK) »
Apologies to carol and to LadyHawk for duplicating information.  Having had my eyes cleared, perhaps I should get someone to look at my brain to see if there is a second brain cell :o
Transcriptions and NBI are merely finding aids.  They are NOT a substitute for original record entries.
Remember - "They'll be found when they want to be found" !!!
If you don't ask the question, you won't get an answer.
He/she who never made a mistake, never made anything.
Archbell - anywhere, any date
Kendall - WRY
Milner - WRY
Appleyard - WRY

Offline dobfarm

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 7,805
  • Scarcliffe village Derbyshire
    • View Profile
Re: Finding female relatives
« Reply #12 on: Saturday 04 May 24 11:59 BST (UK) »
One has to remember ! these dates are just before world war 2, all sorts of things could have happened, like records lost, people being killed in a bombing blitz that were not recorded, service people killed in action or missing not being recorded and there is the 100 years on some documents. Being late or modern times history post 1939 reg, maybe known or findable living relatives may have records in their own family records.

                           Just a thought
Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
Any transcription of information does not identify or prove anything.
Intended as a Guide only in ancestry research.-It is up to the reader as to any Judgment of assessments of information given! to check from original sources.

In my opinion the marriage residence is not always the place of birth. Never forget Workhouse and overseers accounts records of birth
Pages: 1 [2]