Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Ray T

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 ... 174
1
Cheshire / Re: Looking for a Quack Doctor in Wilmslow
« on: Sunday 02 June 24 13:09 BST (UK)  »
You can check the occupancy of the cottages in question on the Cheshire Tithe Map website here - https://maps.cheshireeast.gov.uk/tithemaps/

A search for Gibbon, however, in the whole of Cheshire, returns no results.

2
Technical Help / Re: ENHANCING DOWNLOADS FOR TRANSCRIBING
« on: Monday 13 May 24 15:24 BST (UK)  »

The two images (muster roll and witness statement) have been scanned at 96 dpi.

96, or even 75, dpi is fine for viewing on a computer monitor, however, just as the o/p has found, if you try to enlarge them the quality/readability will deteriorate.

As a rule of thumb, 75-150 dpi is fine for viewing at full size on a computer screen whereas 300 is the optimum for photographic printing. If there is likely to be any need to view somthing at a larger size, you need to up these figures proportionately. Using a higher figure for printing simply wastes disk space. It is generally agreed that increasing resolution beyond 300 doesn’t give you a better image.

What we don’t know is the degree of compression. A perfectly acceptable image can be ruined by too much compression + modifying & re-saving a .jpg as a .jpg can also play havoc with quality.

3
Technical Help / Re: ENHANCING DOWNLOADS FOR TRANSCRIBING
« on: Monday 13 May 24 08:02 BST (UK)  »
I find that scanned images provided by the usual suspects can invariably be improved by a bit of tinkering as Biggles50 says but some are beyond help. This is usually because they have been scanned at too low a resolution or had too great a degree of compression applied. If this is the case, the only solution is to request a better scan.

Sometimes all that is required to make a bad scan readable is to “invert” the scan; i.e. convert it to negative (turn the blacks into whites and vice versa), but you’ll need specific software to do this.

4
To be pedantic, I think it actually says “a” Housekeeper.

5
The Common Room / Re: Ancestry tree: finding individual?
« on: Tuesday 02 April 24 22:45 BST (UK)  »
Open the tree and there should be a search box on the right hand side of the screen.

6
Cheshire / Re: Cheshire (Wirral) Electoral Roll records - about 1960
« on: Tuesday 02 April 24 11:50 BST (UK)  »
The library doesn’t have a car park but, the last time I went, I used the one on the opposite side of Borough Road a short walk away on Turner Street. Come to think of it, I’m sure I had some rellies who lived on a previous incarnation of Turner Street!

7
Cheshire / Re: Cheshire (Wirral) Electoral Roll records - about 1960
« on: Wednesday 27 March 24 08:43 GMT (UK)  »
Try Birkenhead Central Library on Borough Road. I looked at a load there; I think (I’m currently away) from the 1930’s.

8
I managed to trace mine a couple of years ago. From being a child, I remember him being very, very old. I was surprised to find out that he retired quite recently.

9
Handwriting Deciphering & Recognition / Re: What did my great grandmother die of?
« on: Friday 22 March 24 08:38 GMT (UK)  »
I suspect that is something of an oversimplification - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mantoux_test

(I haven’t studied the article in detail as I’m currently on a campsite in Northumberland!)

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 ... 174