Thanks TreeDigger
I think I had my James' and Thomas' confused.
There is a large gap between my 4 and 5.
Though, I am pretty sure there was not another set of Thomases or Sarahs in NZ.
(in NZ bdm or Richmond NZ graveyard)
Thomas Haycock (1829 - 1901)
m 1850 NZ bdm #1850/288
Sarah Anne Harford (1832-1923)
Between 1850 and 1869 they had 9 children
>
Sarah Anne Haycock (1865-1896)
born NZ bdm #1865/33, died Raywood, Aus Vic bdm #7504/1896, age 31
(parents listed as Sarah Ann Harford and Thomas Haycock)
m 1885 NZ bdm #1885/445
George Hudson (no one called him Reginald, though he did have a son later by that name)
https://freepages.rootsweb.com/~sooty/genealogy/HUDSONFrame1Source1.html I found the NZ paperspast very good to build an understanding on what the Hudsons were up to.
Setting up a saw mill in NZ, which relates to what they did in Aus.
It probably would not have much info on the 3 Johns.
I have about 6-8 illegitimacies to delve into from George down in Australia!
Though part of the temperance movement in NZ, their morals appear questionable.
I have not started on the Harford/Gerrish/Moody (Wiltshire) or Haycock/Owen/Stansfield/Lyth side in UK ... it could be a while. I still have other ancestral arrivals to Aus / NZ to ponder.
Appreciate your great work!
Cheers
Show Posts
