Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - coombs

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 ... 846
1
The Common Room / Re: Birth registration rules in 1901 UK
« on: Yesterday at 19:05 »
but as we know, until 1875, the onus was on the registrar and his deputies to be on the ball in regards to new births in the district.

The actual wording of the act was that the registrar "is hereby required to inform himself carefully of every Birth and every Death which shall happen within his District".

Records of correspondence in the RG files at TNA make it clear that there was no expectation that the registrar was supposed to go out walking the streets asking about births and deaths or to be knocking on people's doors.

He was required to live within his district and to make his address (and times of availability) known by having a sign "in some conspicuous place on or near the outer door of his own dwelling house".

Announcements placed by registrars in the newspapers of the time advertising times for registering are also quite common.

With young infant deaths in the early/mid Victorian period, although there should be both a birth and a death registration, it isn't uncommon to find only the death recorded by the registrar.

So you could say parents were in a way asked to come forward prior to 1875 then?

2
The Common Room / Re: Birth registration rules in 1901 UK
« on: Yesterday at 13:58 »
I have several birth certs where the parents waited until the last minute to register the birth, or some who registered it days after, but as we know, until 1875, the onus was on the registrar and his deputies to be on the ball in regards to new births in the district. I have once born in rural Essex in late Dec 1843 and birth registered on 31 Dec 1843. I have a old work pal who was born a week before Xmas 1944 and he showed me his birth cert once, registered I think 27 or 28 Dec. His dad was a local clerk. And a 1944 birth had a much higher survival rate than someone born 1844.

3
The Common Room / Re: Accuracy of marriage records
« on: Monday 06 May 24 14:02 BST (UK)  »
Dave Annal also explains that only a small percentage of births went unregistered 1837 to 1874. However that still accounts for several hundred thousand births unregistered inbetween 1837 and 1874. I have 2 direct ancestors and a few ancestor siblings whose births did not seem to be registered, both in Essex and Co Durham.

The percentage of unregistered births is more like maybe 2 to 3% 1837-1874.

4
The Common Room / Re: Accuracy of marriage records
« on: Monday 06 May 24 12:21 BST (UK)  »
I have an ancestor who died in 1831 and his children wed in 1845 and 1856 and said the father's name and occupation, and not if he was deceased or not. The registrar may never have asked, or even if told they maybe thought "too much info, just put name and occupation".

5
The Common Room / Re: GRO digital images £2.50
« on: Sunday 05 May 24 14:52 BST (UK)  »
I have so stocked up on birth certs for ancestors siblings now, and death certs for those who died in infancy, as well as adulthood. The new feature is great. No longer having to wait up to 3 weeks like before especially when WDYTYA was on and it made demand for BMD cert orders from GRO go through the roof.

That's what I've been doing, buying the death certificates for those who died young.  Of course we had the burial registers for dates in some cases but it's interesting to see little ones who died of childhood diseases which have now almost been eradicated in this country at least and young adults  dying of illnesses that would probably be cured these days.

I have some who died quickly, of cholera "12 hours" or so, or fever 2 days etc. Adults and children as well. Also as I am sure many others will have experienced, many of my ancestors died of "phthisis" which is pulmonary TB. And sometimes after a long battle such as my ancestor Charlotte Stock who died in 1849 aged 42 of "phthisis, 2 years".

6
The Common Room / Re: GRO digital images £2.50
« on: Saturday 04 May 24 18:24 BST (UK)  »
I have so stocked up on birth certs for ancestors siblings now, and death certs for those who died in infancy, as well as adulthood. The new feature is great. No longer having to wait up to 3 weeks like before especially when WDYTYA was on and it made demand for BMD cert orders from GRO go through the roof.

7
Being able to identify parentage so far back will be very much hit and miss.

I have been searching for one who fathered a child born in 1873 for near on eight years without success so far.  The usual, so many cM matches with no useful ID, shared matches and no trees that offer anything even remotely helpful.

An Ancestry DNA test is a good place to start the search.

Yes you have to be prepared for a long, long wait with DNA testing for genealogy. A 3xgreat grandparent is 6 generations back, so while in paper trail times it can be quite recent, seeing as some researchers can get a paper trail going back to Charlemagne, but in DNA terms it is a fair way back.

8
Coombs
I don't know if DNA will be able to disprove that at that level but it might be able to corroborate theory IF his descendants or descendants of his siblings have tested & IF their trees are accurate.

Occasionally I do a random name search of an unusual surname in a matches tree.

At the moment I'm doing some location searches  a supposed  paternal great grandfather came from Liverpool and great grandmother from Chatham Kent but I believe their respective parents both came from Chatham.

I am yet to jump on the DNA bandwagon but have read your OP about your John and it is a good idea of yours.

My aforementioned 2xgreat gran's likely father Thomas had a married sister but she never had any children however he himself did have a daughter born 1851 by his first wife who died in November 1863. And Thomas and his 2nd wife, who I descend from, had children after the illegitimate child in December 1863.


9
Good thinking, and thinking outside the box can help a lot.

My 2xgreat grandmother was illegitimate, born 31 Dec 1863 to a single mother who was the daughter of a local wheelwright. The mother Mary lived right opposite a manor house in the leafy hilly Sussex village she was born and raised in. No father named on the January 1864 birth certificate. The mother then moved to London with a fellow Sussex man (originally born Kent) in around April/May 1864 and they married in July 1864 at West Hackney church. He was a manservant, a footman. He said he was the father on the child's baptism in November 1864 at West Hackney church. Turns out he was married to a very ill wife up to November 1863 (long battle with TB) when his future wife was about 10 months pregnant. DNA testing will be the way to go to confirm my hypothesis, but also I am prepared to discover if the father was maybe another man.

I even have researched many of the other men in the village she lived at with and none seemed to be a candidate, unless he was from further afield.

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 ... 846