Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - halhawk

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 ... 33
1
The Common Room / Re: WDYTYA - Mark Wright
« on: Thursday 12 September 19 23:36 BST (UK)  »
I have to agree with the majority here - definitely the best of this series.  I vaguely knew where he first came to TV notice, and so wasn't expecting too much, but ... WOW!!  He showed interest, empathy and a sense of fun (the sword fighting, anyone?).  Unlike so many he had obviously taken in the family stories from childhood and made them part of his personal history.  So often others have said ' oh yes, we were..... ' but don't seem to have really thought what that meant.

The Talk with his grandfather showed their closeness, and the final scene was genuinely moving.

And I was knocked speechless when he went to the synagogue and made the clear connection to the time the furniture was produced  - he clearly knew who Oliver Cromwell was!

2

I thought exactly the same and some how because Emmaline Pankhurst was the registrar for her grandmother's birth, her gt gran became a militant suffragette!

I suspect the programme was making use of the fact that most people will have heard of the Suffragettes, and that there was the useful link to Emmeline to attach the story to.  I think that not even all members of the WSPU would have called themselves Suffragettes, and probably some women who were not WSPU might have qualified as Suffragettes under the 'popular' definition of the time.

I just did 2 quick searches of the 1911 census using just the keyword 'suffragist' and then 'suffragette', and there looks to be some interesting entries there.  When I have more time I'll look in more detail.  One thing that interests me is how many men may have recorded their wives/sisters/daughters as suffragist/suffragettes.  (BTW don't try 'suffrage' as a keyword - there was a street in Smethwick, Worcs called Suffrage Street! :o )

3
The Common Room / Re: Quick survey - how do you deal with "maybes" in your tree?
« on: Friday 01 September 17 17:54 BST (UK)  »
I keep a paper file of notes about unidentified connections, and try to check them out every so often - eg currently one reads '1861 George Edward, grandson - whose son???' and is listed under the grandfather's name - should be fairly easy, only 5 possible dads!  Much easier than the ones headed 'which website did I find .....'?

With possible events I now put a note with the event saying things like 'possible', 'most likely', 'see also...' - sadly some errors I made in the beginning on Ancestry were just copied straight to other trees - these I at least try to notify when I find them.  If anything on my tree now has my note suggesting the event is not definite I figure if it's copied as 100% fact subsequently it's not my problem. After all, if someone copies the event, they can surely read what it actually says in the description box!

4
The Common Room / Re: What is 'Fold3'?
« on: Friday 01 September 17 17:39 BST (UK)  »
I was going to say - Like this?

http://www.ancestry.com/cs/offers/compare

But

1/ There doesn't seem to be a UK version

2/ There's even a level above All Access to get the enhanced Newspapers.com records

That's very annoying. I just took out a month sub after at least a year without any sub, looked at the 'compare' table and tried to work out what might be offered by All Access, since it was on the sub list, but not in the table.  I still probably wouldn't have gone for it, since I wasn't expecting to find many military records I haven't already seen, but it would have been nice to know what I was refusing.  (Of course almost the first new record I found was military!)

5
The Common Room / Re: WDYTYA Series 14 #4 Adil Ray
« on: Friday 28 July 17 12:49 BST (UK)  »
I expected to enjoy this from the Radio Times write up, and eventually I did, but found it slow to get going.  Once he arrived in Africa it became much more enjoyable and interesting.  I would have liked another minute or two looking at the reasons for the movement of the Kenyan Asians to Britain.  It was a different approach looking at it from the point of view of someone who had a fairly solid knowledge of the family history, and was confirming and expanding that knowledge rather than just having 'a story' which has often been the case.  And even getting the 'story' (about royal connections) confirmed!

As others have said, it proves the importance of talking to older relatives, and I thought it also showed how cultures with a tradition of oral history can be very valuable to social historians. I just wonder how much that tradition is still surviving into younger generations in Africa. Growing up I had little knowledge about either side of my family, and I query how much my cousins, nephews and nieces would know even about my grandparents' generation without the bits I keep passing on ... no real tradition of oral history!

6
Australia / Re: Clarification about Assisted Immigration, please - Queensland 1871
« on: Thursday 06 July 17 01:47 BST (UK)  »
That's interesting ... not too difficult to get that as long as references from extended family were acceptable ... Matilda was from one of the less well off branches, but others were well-to-do tenant farmers or farm owners, and at least 2 were local magistrates (would need to check which one it might have been then).  Not sure if she was officially employed ... oldest of a fairly large family, and they had a farm tenancy, so suspect she helped in the home/on the farm.  Unfortunately although the 1871 Census was taken a week before she sailed, she was recorded as a visitor at an aunt's house ... presumably making a round of goodbye calls.

The list on the Index had one woman marked as Matron, which I did suspect might mean supervisor. I'm not sure I would be enthusiastic about supervising 102 15-31 yr olds on a voyage that long.

Thanks again
halhawk

7
Australia / Re: Clarification about Assisted Immigration, please - Queensland 1871
« on: Wednesday 05 July 17 23:01 BST (UK)  »
Many thanks to all of you.  The information about the Immigration Act is exactly what I was looking for, so she presumably went as a domestic servant.  She must have settled in quickly and within 3 years she had married and settled in Brisbane. I'm glad to have found out what happened and been able to cross off one of my 'lost cousins'.

Cheers
halhawk :)

8
Australia / Clarification about Assisted Immigration, please - Queensland 1871
« on: Wednesday 05 July 17 17:23 BST (UK)  »
Hi - apologies if this has been answered somewhere already.  I think I have a general idea about how Assisted Immigration worked, but I have a query prompted by looking at a scan of the Index of Assisted Immigration found online at Queensland State Archives.

My distant (and previously totally vanished) relative is listed arriving at Moreton Bay in July 1871. The Index shows her as part of a group of 105 (almost entirely) young single women, under the heading 'Free'.  How was this different to the group labelled 'Assisted?  I have very quickly found a great deal of information about her subsequent life in Brisbane, including (from an obituary) that she used to say she went out to Australia for a holiday and stayed! Somehow I don't think the holiday fits with her entry on the register?

Thanks for any help
halhawk :)

9
The Common Room / Re: Another FindMyPast £1/Month offer - be quick!
« on: Wednesday 28 June 17 22:44 BST (UK)  »
Thanks for posting the offer, bugbear.  I had been planning to get a month's sub (primarily for the Newspaper Archive) at some point in the future, and had been making a list of events to look for.  This offer means I haven't had to wait ... and almost the first thing I found was something I never knew existed ... a photo of my grandfather!  I had never seen a picture of him ... and he has my father's smile (or I suppose the other way round)  ... many thanks :)

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 ... 33