1
England / Adoption mid 1940s
« on: Monday 22 April 24 15:15 BST (UK) »
Hello,
I wonder if anyone can clarify the situation regarding adoptions in England in the mid 1940s, please?
Two siblings were adopted in the mid 1940s, I have copies of their birth certs, and both certs have 'adopted' and the signature of the superintendant registrar. The children would have been under 5 years old at the time.
So my query is really about the 'kind' of adoptions at that time, does the possibility of a 'so-called' 'private adoption' still exist at this time, ie, where the birth mother (possibly) 'found' a family (not related) and 'gave' the children to that family?
And if that type of adoption did exist, would it result in 'adopted' being on the birth certs?
Both children did keep their first names, but had a new surname (they stayed together).
This probably happened close to the end of the war or shortly after the war, so I appreciate that things may have been done a little differently.
Or is the scenario more likely, that the children were removed from the mother's care for some reason (or she was unable to care for them and they were removed), and then either an authority or a children's home stepped in and the adoption was arranged by them?
Or is there another possibility of how the adoption could've come about?
Thanks for any insights into how adoptions were at that time,
Lisa
I wonder if anyone can clarify the situation regarding adoptions in England in the mid 1940s, please?
Two siblings were adopted in the mid 1940s, I have copies of their birth certs, and both certs have 'adopted' and the signature of the superintendant registrar. The children would have been under 5 years old at the time.
So my query is really about the 'kind' of adoptions at that time, does the possibility of a 'so-called' 'private adoption' still exist at this time, ie, where the birth mother (possibly) 'found' a family (not related) and 'gave' the children to that family?
And if that type of adoption did exist, would it result in 'adopted' being on the birth certs?
Both children did keep their first names, but had a new surname (they stayed together).
This probably happened close to the end of the war or shortly after the war, so I appreciate that things may have been done a little differently.
Or is the scenario more likely, that the children were removed from the mother's care for some reason (or she was unable to care for them and they were removed), and then either an authority or a children's home stepped in and the adoption was arranged by them?
Or is there another possibility of how the adoption could've come about?
Thanks for any insights into how adoptions were at that time,
Lisa